So few professional sets ???
 

The first time I see Pandora was on Striptease. I am still amazing not only for her hot body and big boobs, but also by her beautiful face and green eyes. =O

But I wonder why she got so few professional photoshoots, she totally deserved better pics. I mean, apart of the low quality, her locations were mainly regular backyard gardens and cheap hotel rooms.

She still looks gorgeous but by the fame she got I think she was "wasted" on her best years on almost candid quality sets. Do you know any reason for this ?
Here I post two examples to make my point.

http://ist3-4.filesor.com/pimpandhos...ndora296_0.jpg http://ist3-4.filesor.com/pimpandhos...niform03_0.jpg

That's her....no big boobies

tragic... would have suited growing old with them still in situ

she was "wasted" on her best years on almost candid quality sets. Do you know any reason for this ?

I belonged to her club in the old days, early 90s, and all her images were of very low quality. Even when cameras made an enormous leap in quality, her pics were still lousy as she had her friend "photographer" use the same dumpy camera with low specs. She never used proper lighting, preferring to use the highest ASA rating on the digital camera which produced grainy results. When she switched to her new club alliance her pics were still amateurish in nature. The reason.... cheaper that way.

Always follow the money for most answers in life.