View Full Version : Turn offs in pictures
Sam Spade
10-31-2006, 07:25 PM
For me a beautiful picture, either vintage or modern can be ruined in many ways, i absolutely loathe tattoo's on a woman, especially on her breasts, if i click on a thumb nail of a woman and i see a tattoo i will always close the page, no matter how good she looks, i also hate to see a woman smoking or with obvious fake breasts, you see some woman with what looks like two tennis balls about 6 inches apart on their chest, grotesque.
I have listed a few of my own "hates" above, in the poll, but I'm sure that some of you good folk will probably love them, it takes all sorts i guess ;)
If your pet hate is not up there then please feel free to tell us what it is.* ;D
Sam.
Wulfram
10-31-2006, 07:56 PM
I feel absolutely the same about tattoos, and in fact dislike anything that involves a permanent alteration of the natural character of the body or - oh dear! - the piercing of it; very short hair in a woman is also a distinct turn-off for me, or rat-nibbled hair, or hair that is very obviously dyed, especially in artificial colours.
nevergrey
11-01-2006, 02:31 PM
I don't like smoking girls. :nono: It's a shame to watch nice girls and handsome women abusing themselves with a toxic cocktail of over 4000 chemicals. No thanks.
Another turn off is a shaved woman's skin. What a loss of natural beauty! :'(
lambique
11-01-2006, 02:37 PM
Shaved girls, fake breasts, tattoes and other "body arts" are definitely what i don't like. All i ask, as many here: natural women.
christoph64297
11-01-2006, 03:27 PM
i also hate to see a woman smoking or with obvious fake breasts,
why some of you only dislike "obvious fake breasts"? In my opinion every form of putting plastic or anything else under the skin is something most disgusting. I can't understand, why women are spending money and oftly their health for something like that, and even more I can't understand, why men think fondling a piece of plastic would be erotic. I'm shuddering just thinking about this.
elwood
11-02-2006, 11:20 AM
fake breats without a doubt... I can live peacefully with tatooes, some are even good (and there are vintage with tatooes ;D). Shaved pussies are even worse - too pedophilic for me and a total turn off. I already rejected some girls after they removed their panties and showed a shaved pussy - hate it (but they still can give good blowjobs with their panties on hehe >:D)
Spiderman
11-02-2006, 12:38 PM
I don't like tatoos, fakebreasts and all kinds of piercing - earrings are welcome ;).
It does not really turn me off so I say it in another way: Stockings without garterbelts do not look very nice to me.
regards
BELERAPHON
11-03-2006, 06:35 PM
false teeth ;D ;D
surfer
11-03-2006, 07:18 PM
Who told women that men like fake breasts? A woman’s natural breasts are part of her body that blends with the rest of her and makes her unique. If they only knew what we ‘Men’ think of them with their plastic. Some women are indeed a work of art in their natural state and when they mess with their body they become a mess. This messing includes tattoos, smoking, piercing and the footballs on the chest look. Give me a natural girl or woman made up and suitably dressed for every occasion, anytime. ;D ;D ;D
klasse_fraun
11-03-2006, 08:41 PM
hi f-u-d-z-y
fake tits :nono:
female expression general-but one thing is for me a eyecatcher:freckles(not only with redhair) :bow:
Sam Spade
11-05-2006, 12:32 PM
I guess the results (so far) don't lie, so don't bother posting any pictures of women with fake breasts and tattoo's ;)
Personally i don't mind a little enhancement, just to fill them out a little, rather than enlarging them.
Below are two examples of what i loathe, why on earth the first girl thought that those tattoo'swould look good is beyond me. :(
And the second girl tits are just awful, so false.
lambique
11-05-2006, 02:46 PM
For photos with tatoos, there is still a solution if you have time to lose: Photoshop... ;D
Something that in fact i can't stand is violence, urology and scatology. It is beyond my understanding but i'm a rather boring person! :D
surfer
11-05-2006, 07:36 PM
Sam Spade is right. Just look at his photo number 7 that girl would look good with her natural breasts instead of the two 'balls'
she has gone and replaced them with. I think a thread should be opened for the most revolting fake breasts, but then, who
wants to view that sort of thing. ::) ::) ::)
strapper
11-05-2006, 11:17 PM
Fake tits, horrible.
Shaved pussy, not interested.
Hairy armpits, yuk.
Tattoos - unless they are discreet, small and well placed they are an instant turn off. A well done tattoo on a lady's shoulder can be erotic, tattoos on breasts, arms and legs just scream "slag." As a leg- man, I hate nothing more than a shapely lady in nylons and heels with a tattoo on her ankle >:( BTW, I am tattooed myself, double standards?
Scat & piss - each to their own but it turns me off.
Hairy legs. Not for me.
Plastic surgery, full stop. An average woman can be very sexy and erotic, it's how she is in herself. An enhanced beauty just strikes me as fake.
Feel free to disagree, just my opinions, but wouldn't life be boring if we all liked the same things ;D
Airola
11-06-2006, 10:29 AM
Tattoos
I prefer without them but then again it's not a problem if someone has a tattoo. Tattoos might be beautiful (in rare occasions though).
Smoking
I don't like smoking at all. In some occasions the smoke and a cigarrette can bring some artistic value to the picture though. But usually it is pretty distracting.
Obvious tan lines
Not a problem, although very obvious tan lines might sometimes look a bit weird.
Obvious fake breasts
I don't get it. Why do people take silicones? In my opinion, there is no need to make small breasts larger and there is no need to raise hanging breasts. It all makes the natural beauty of breasts go completely away. To me, this is the most irritating thing.
Too much body hair
A bit too much may be better than a bit too little. Well, too much is too much. Beards and stuff... no thanks.
But I don't mind seeing hairy arm pits, lot's of pubic hair and maybe some hair on legs and arms (although again, too much is too much on legs and arms).
Legs spread wide open with close up of pussy
I prefer seeing the girls face also... So, close-ups alone aren't much worth anything.
Other (please explain)
I'm not much into women with a "slutty" expression on their face. It fits to "mistresses" and all things bdsm and stuff, but apart from that... It just feels quite stupid.
Very over or under weight
I can deal with both of them but too much is too much though.
Also, if I had to choose from under and over weighted, I'd pick overweighted.
Tights (Pantyhose)
Not a problem.
nevergrey
11-06-2006, 11:04 AM
Feel free to disagree, just my opinions, but wouldn't life be boring if we all liked the same things ;D
Absolute correct! http://bestsmileys.com/peace/1.gif
Selenia
11-06-2006, 05:58 PM
I can't stand the look of fake tits (plus it makes me wonder whether some of them have terrible back pains from the huge ones they get), and smoking. I just want to see women that enjoy their bodies, and don't try to force themselves to be stick thin. Curvy is lovely. :)
surfer
11-06-2006, 08:18 PM
If 'Women' wants to see what natural women look like let them look at the old masters paintings of nude women.
One will see there are no twigs.
Natural women are best.
i hate girls smile at me when fucking somebody else !!!
also tights and boots...
Black Rat
11-06-2006, 10:34 PM
Lesbianism... I really can't find anything erotic in two (or more) women going at it, even if one uses a strap-on...
Sam Spade
11-06-2006, 11:04 PM
i hate girls smile at me when fucking somebody else !!!
also tights and boots...
I agree with that, i like to see a woman in nothing but high heels, but not boots, cowboy boots in particular, and tights are just so damn ugly when compared to stockings.
anony_monster
11-06-2006, 11:13 PM
sry but I LOVE TATTOOES on women
very sexy indeed
a good example is VIPER
and dawn stone and papilion
goldern jade i think have some too
lynge77
11-07-2006, 02:51 AM
-i don't like them slutty. I don't know what that exact would be, but for example a lady with pink hair, piercings and leather pants turns me off. Some Weekend Sex mags from the 80's was showing lesbian series, taken from a studio, with ladies messed up like that. This could not be more unnatrual for me.
I have a passion for mature women, but many of them have for some reason tatoos which does not fit to the beauty for their natrual body. Don't know why....
Anyway, to much hair can also be too extreme. I think there is a reason why men are men and vomen are vomen.
As different people can be, as different can their turn offs become or be. I think it will be a endless discussion... ::) -but good for mind...
LoveLover
11-08-2006, 12:16 PM
My turn offs:
- Shaven pussies
- tatoos
- piercings
- fake tits
- overweight women
For Me :
Smoking = turn on
Obvious tan lines = turn on
body hair (inc pussy) = tun on , but not extreme cases
Legs spread wide open with close up of pussy = don't mind
Tights (Pantyhose) = don't mind
Obvious fake breasts = turn off
Very over or under weight = turn off
piercing = turn off
Other (please explain) =those stupid WIGS many good looking women wear , trying to hide their id perhaps?? Both retro and modern are unpleasant
Also, not exactly turn off but distracting = looking right into the camera when sucking cock, fucking etc,
thus breaking the so-called "Fourth Wall " (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_wall)
I guess I like more the plot driven fiction-influenced porn and not the old documentary-like straight fuck and suck
Wulfram
11-08-2006, 07:23 PM
* * *'Too much body hair (inc pussy)* = tun on , but not extreme cases'
- Nature is inclined to run wild, just like my garden; but where does one draw the line?
JerryFalwell
11-09-2006, 01:39 AM
* * *'Too much body hair (inc pussy)* = tun on , but not extreme cases'
- Nature is inclined to run wild, just like my garden; but where does one draw the line?
Not here! >:D
LoveLover
11-09-2006, 06:37 AM
Oh, I forgot some more turn offs.
- Natural big tits. I like Jane Baker's tits but their size is the absolute maximum to my taste. Sarah Young's tits are ugly IMHO. (With Jane Baker, it's her face I just love!)
- Shaggy tits. (That's why I don't like big tits, sooner or later they start shagging. I bet even my beloved Jane Baker has shaggy tits by now. Perfectly sized tis, like the ones Ursula Gausmann has, usually stay beautiful all through a girls life. I'll bet Gausmann's tits still look wonderful today)
Filou
11-09-2006, 11:04 PM
Tattoos
No problem if they are artistic (another subjective point of view). For example a colourful traditional chinese dragon on the back of a asian girl can be very sensual.
Smoking
I don't like girls with suicidal tendencies. :-\
Obvious tan lines
Never mind.
Obvious fake breasts
No way! >:(
Too much body hair
What's the definition of too much? I like unshaved girls, but there's no need for hormonal dysfunctions. ;)
Legs spread wide open with close up of pussy
Watching a pussy closeup is like viewing a incomplete work of art.
Other (please explain)
Shaved pussy; too much makeup, excessive dyed hair; too much jewellery.
Very over or under weight
No problem within my aesthetic values
Tights (Pantyhose)
Never mind.
grenadanightowl
11-12-2006, 06:30 AM
Tattoos are a turnoff for me, but I can accept them better than humongus fake breasts. You know the kind I mean, where the woman looks as though she had two bowling balls implanted in her chest. Small breasts, drooping breasts, whatever, your body is what it is, accept it, love it & move on. As for the tattoos I sometimes wonder what these young women will think about them when their grandchildren come along. I'm an old man & I regret the one I got 30 years ago. Thanks for allowing me to spout off...
knee highs and tennis shoes...
Hair Force One
04-28-2007, 03:15 PM
Bad image quality.* ;)
Others:
- shaved pussy
- shaved armpits (tolerable but not optimal)
- too much makeup
- too many or too big tattoos
- too overweighted
- too skinny
- very big breasts
- faked breasts
- too many piercings
- too much jewellery
- smoking
- bright colored hair
- wigs
- girls that look unemotional or grin in the camera like an insurance agent while fucking (like the girls in many Silwa magazines)
retro6090
04-29-2007, 12:39 PM
False tits are the single biggest turn-off there is - and as for the girls that think they have improved their appearance with a boob job, well, the less said the better.
Don't generally like tattoos either, although some discreet ones can be OK.
Belle
04-29-2007, 01:39 PM
My overall turn offs are mature men who have let themselves go. Like, over weight, bad teeth, smokers (you don't get the smell from the pictures) , beer belly's, dyed hair, and the famous comb-over. So men, take a lesson from us girls and watch yourselves. :D
Little Red Rooster
04-29-2007, 03:43 PM
Tattoos for sure. Some are okay, if they're small and feminine and in the right place. But generally, don't care for them at all. Most piercings other than ears, for that matter as well. Never been a big fan of body or facial piercings.
Smoking cigarettes is a big turnoff. I don't mind a chick with a cigar though...
Fake tits. Hate 'em with a passion. They look bad, and feel worse. I especially hate it when a porn star I like who has had natural tits for some time gets them. That pretty much ruins it for me every time.
Not a fan of body hair. Armpit hair I find especially revolting. I prefer shaved pussies (I seem to be in the minority here, but I suppose that's no surprise for a vintage forum). I particularly don't like hair on the vulva in most cases. Hair on the mons I don't mind, as long as it doesn't look wild and unkempt.
Girls that are so skinny you can see their ribs and other bones sticking out. Not at all attractive.
Gaping asses and pussies. No thank you.
Marks on the skin from creased clothing. I always found this kind of annoying. I think models should be naked for a least a half hour before the shoot, only getting into wardrobe when shooting is about to commence so as to avoid this.
Fake cumshots. I prefer no cumshot at all to a fake one.
There may be more, but this stuff immediately springs to mind.
djetz
04-29-2007, 04:53 PM
Stubble on women.
Shaved or cropped pubes are a major turn-off for me.
It's the biggest reason I find modern porn unwatchable.
EDIT: My other pet hate: tan lines. I don't care for tanned skin in general (though naturally dark skin is lovely) and I love fair skin. Tan lines are repulsive, nearly as bad as crotch stubble.
Why mess with what nature has provided? ;)
Can't stand the idea of implants - my sister in-law has had hers done and thinks they're great (I think she's gone top heavy...) - but she'll have to have them re-done every ten years or so for the rest of her life - if she can still afford it.
I came of age with Mayfair when bodies were normal and pubes trimmed to a neat triangle - not too much, not too little. I pitty the lads growing up thinking that Pam Anderson post 're-fit' is some kind of ideal - if you see her in her first Playboy set she was gorgeous - now she just looks tragic: IMHO... :-\
Whats more, for every bloke who likes huge tits, there are as many who like average or small ones - but women always seem to think men want bigger. I think when I was at school it was called vulgar fractions.... ::)
Pub
aerosmith
05-01-2007, 06:56 AM
Biggest turn-offs: bald pussies, fake tits, tattoos, piercings.
Turn-on`s : natural beauties, it means natural tits in all sizes they come, unshaven pussies - slightly trimmed is tolerable, but bald pussy on grown-up women is weird and complitely unsexy. I also don`t mind little body hair here and there. It actually depends up on individual. If hair, where ever it is, pubic area, armpits, is thick and darker, it is sexy. If there are couple of 5 cm hair of unknown colour, it is not so beautiful.
theonerichy
07-09-2007, 11:56 AM
my biggest turn off is those fake cum shots, nothing worse than seeing a girl covered in 9 gallons wallpaper paste. other than that i dont like hairy all over women, yuk! and big black tattoos on pasty white skin...it sticks out a mile and looks out of place
Hellcat9
07-09-2007, 06:54 PM
I find false boobs abhorrent and I agree with lots of you here. On another note , I find pictures showing a girl having a piss or even worse, taking a dump, absolutely disgusting and simply cannot understand why anybody would find imagery like that appealing. ???
HC9
garuda37
07-13-2007, 03:39 PM
1. Tattoos
2. Piercing (except earrings and nose rings on Indian models only)
3. Boob jobs
4. Wigs (especially those bad '80s ones)
5. Very long false nails (trashy)
6. Trashy/tarty clothes
7. Dildoes/toys - big turn-on for some, big turn-off for me (certain natural objects are ok sometimes though, like, er, bananas ;))
8. Smoking
9. Lesbian scenes (which I guess puts me in the minority)
Men:
Any of the above that may apply, plus long hair
jasondiablo
07-13-2007, 10:43 PM
My biggest turn off in porn has to be dirty feet .. not sure why, maybe I have a mental condition !!
pnorton
07-14-2007, 12:01 AM
women covered in shit turn me off
riteman
07-21-2007, 04:11 AM
Bukkake -- absolutely hate it. It's a 'shot of cum" (supposedly, there's never a dck in sight) and I can see no reason except for degradation. I guess "cum" can be a noun or a verb.
A cum-shot should be an ejaculation in progress bought on in any way by the woman. OK- a guy may instinctively grab his dck at the final moment but that's a long way from the 5 minute jerk off over a woman's face which is almost essential today.
Also tattoos, piercings, violence. Often wondered about those pissing mves. Often it's in a lush setting and they piss all over the sofa and carpets. Wouldn't it really stink there a day later?
ordenstaat
07-21-2007, 10:33 PM
- watersports
- panties being pulled to one side - just take the darn things off!!
- excessively short masculine style haircuts on women, but also that eighties back-combed and hair-sprayed to death look!
- garments being left on in stripping sets eg skirts and bras around the waist
- badly put together shoots - eg ill fitting costumes
- excessively skinny women (who incidentally seem to dominate 'modern' adult websites)
Sam Spade
07-22-2007, 01:33 PM
- garments being left on in stripping sets eg skirts and bras around the waist
I totally agree with you,* you see it a lot with BBW and matures, trying to hide their plump bellies or middle age spread, but i like those things, that's why i look at pictures of BBW and matures. :-\
Do they really think they are fooling anybody?
therealwanksta
07-22-2007, 04:58 PM
Turn ons: ;D ;D ;D
Really hairy pussy. The most perfect is when they have hair starting from the top of their stomachs going all the way down the pussy then going back their ass to their lower backs. Seeing a model without a hairy pussy is like a sundae without the hotfudge. ;D ;D
Saggy boobs. Perfect ex: Christy Canyon and Kelli Stewart ;D
Tanned lines around the pussies, ass and tits. Its like the farmer's tan lines are an emphasis on those areas, which gets me off big time. ;D ;D
I love it when the model wears jewelry like pearls or gold chains or any other kind around their necks. Earrings. Nails done.
Pumps, the most sexy footwear. ;D ;D
Eye shadow. Makes the chick look fiendish, like a zombie, or in a trance. ;D ;D
Stockings or socks that are pulled up high. Socks with stripes are really sexy. ;D ;D
Dressing classy. Secretary or school girl with 2 pigtails on each side. Hippie chicks in sun dresses or other apparal. ;D
When a chick talks really dirty before performing. She must talk more dirtier than a man. ;D
Turnoffs: Tattoos, heavy makeup, fake tits, saggy pussy lips, shaved pussy. hariy legs, arms, armpits
pedonbio
07-23-2007, 11:14 AM
I have to assume you guys are talking about pictures of women because, given the long list of turn-offs some of you list, you've never been laid. :-\
The list at the top of this thread had a funny effect on me: It made me think of the best experience I ever had with a woman with each of the particular "turn-offs" listed.
jillbird
07-23-2007, 03:02 PM
i agree with almost all the other replies.
also, i hate models who look happy while being bondaged or beaten, and those who look indifferent; indifference only comes after a very long session when despair has already set in.
i dont like girl on girl stuff or women domming men; men dominate, women suffer; thats how i like it.
stay-up stockings are ok, but all stockings should fit well, up to the tops of the thighs and sussies should lie snug below the belly button.
high heels with ankle straps are essential.
its always nice to see the woman in her clothes before she is undressed.
i dont like to see blood in the pics; its too nasty!!
women looking happy while getting anal, believe me it hurts too much to do anything but scream!!
chaino
07-24-2007, 09:22 AM
trannies
boots (ankle and calf hidden)
pee and shit
devodevo
07-25-2007, 02:21 PM
It's gotta be the smoking thing for me. I don't mind the look...but my brain automatically begins to smell the smoke on her breath.
19gc19
07-25-2007, 05:16 PM
Skinny girls
Flat chests
Flat asses
etc...
:-[
Jism Jim
08-19-2007, 04:06 PM
Lesbianism... I really can't find anything erotic in two (or more) women going at it, even if one uses a strap-on...
The advantage is that you don't have to look at a man's face during the pussy-eating scenes ;) .
My turn-offs:
-fake cum shots (better no cumshot than a fake one)
-girls keeping a piece of clothing on during the entire set. Especially the Finn Hansen flicks have that. Way too often those cute Seventeen girls kept that top around their belly
- Camera men not showing the good points of a woman's body. When she has a good rack, and/or a good butt, show it for fuck's sake!
Of course there's more, but it has already been mentioned.
gordian_knot
08-19-2007, 05:01 PM
I find tattoos and piercing really ugly, although a very small tattoo can sometimes be overlooked if it's not in too prominent a place, e.g. Erika.
wusler
10-24-2007, 02:23 PM
I myself love piercings and tatoos. Also some girls with boob jobs look very nice. For example Kelly Trump or Gina Wild. But I cannot look at hairy pussys or overweight, this makes me freezing.
I voted for exaggerated breasts implants
By my main turn off if piercings... on any place, specially in tongue and pussy.
Disgusting...
Athlon
03-03-2008, 08:42 PM
For me tattoos are a turn-on... i love 'm that goes with piercings as well :D ....
cccmagfan
03-03-2008, 09:07 PM
Well, number one turn-off are fake breasts. What's obvious? There are only very few fake breasts that look OK in most positions.
Anyways, I prefer natural saggy breasts over fakes. I like the way saggy breasts change their size and shape depending on the position. But natural firm breasts like on many CC 100~120 covers are really great.
Tattoo art can be great. I remember my first visit to the Venus Fair, one of the first girls I saw was "Petra" with flames tattoed above her pussy. I thought to myself: If all of the fair is like that, I can't stand this for very long...
Number two: Cluless tattooes are horrible: Here a little bit, there another, ...
Number three: Excessive Piercing, earrings, nose rings, etc. can be annoying. But if it's done well, it's OK. I like asymetrical lower lip ring piercing most. And I think it's better to have two on one nose wing than one on each side, etc...
Bottom line: Most girls are CLUELESS. Some have style and taste!
Edit: I Almost forgot.. I H-A-T-E arrogant plastic surgeons who tink they are god. I saw in interview where one of them claimed that the nipples MUST be half way between shoulder and elbow. Maybe that aplies to an A-Cup, but there's NO way for D+ to follow that rule without using concrete.
Dr Shipherd
03-04-2008, 12:08 AM
Here are some of my turn-offs:
Tattoos - I never liked them in the first place, but now that they're all over the place, I hate them with an even greater passion. To me, it's the equivalent of drawing a moustache on the Mona Lisa.
Excessive Body Hair - I like a good, well-groomed bit of shrubbery, but beyond that, I'll pass on the body hair, thank you.
Platform Shoes - Even in the 70's, they looked dorky and awkward.
Scat/Pee - EEEEWWWWW!!!!!! :mad:
Henry Chinaski
03-04-2008, 12:18 AM
Tats and bizarro piercings have ruined many a beautiful woman. If you're offended by vag close ups, then a Will & Grace fanboard is a better place to spend your time at. Although I'm not thrilled with fake breasts, the photograpgers at Playboy and Penthouse back in the day had a real talent to photograph a woman who sported silicone in such a way that it left doubts. This required skill, which sadly, many photogs do not have in the digital age.
hartwig
03-20-2008, 08:46 PM
- obviously faked breasts
- women that are too thin or MUCH too fat
- animal porn
- people hurting themselves, like needles tuck everywhere
But I have no probs with:
- watersports
- scat
- fisting
- enema
actually I can find that very arousing
But the most arousing thing is a beatiful girl with beautiful real boobs and a real pussy!! :)
peachair
03-20-2008, 08:49 PM
Bald fannies!!! every modern porno now has shaved pussies. WTF!!!!!!!!!
Spanner
03-20-2008, 09:55 PM
I don't like it, when (cigarette)smoke comes out of a woman's nose. That reminds me of a dragon.
And I absolutely don't like false breasts.
johnmcwhatsit
03-20-2008, 10:35 PM
small tattoos are erotic, big tattoos are ugly
http://thumbnails.imagebam.com/130/88b35f1292201.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/88b35f1292201)
Henry Chinaski
03-21-2008, 12:08 AM
Nobody ever includes "Piercings in areas that make YOU, the VIEWER wince" in these things. I know I could select "Other" but, piercings, with the exception of one per ear are AWFUL.
MASUDAYA
03-21-2008, 12:39 AM
fake cumshots for sure, mainly that yellowish stuff that looks like mayo:
http://img23.imagevenue.com/loc1087/th_63339_13_122_1087lo.jpg (http://img23.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=63339_13_122_1087lo.jpg)
jayvan
03-21-2008, 01:19 AM
All of the above (tattoos, piercings, fake boobs, too much make-up, those stupid long fake finger nails) and why, oh why, do they leave their high-heel shoes on during lesbian scenes? Totally ruins it for me.
Mr.Bungle
03-21-2008, 02:24 AM
My 'other' choice: Shoes!! :mad:
And, for the record:
Nay: Tats
Nay: Piercings
Nay: Fake boobs (any size)
Nay: Smoking
Nay: Bare pubes
Nay: Looking at the camera (couples sets)
Nay: Fake man-goo courtesy of hand lotion, Miracle Whip or Colgate.
dicko111
03-21-2008, 01:07 PM
Tattoos, piercing, fake tits, pantyhose, pissing on others, arse licking. They are all turn offs.
nudude
03-26-2008, 04:52 PM
Excessive Body Hair - I like a good, well-groomed bit of shrubbery, but beyond that, I'll pass on the body hair, thank you.
Scat/Pee - EEEEWWWWW!!!!!! :mad:
Different strokes...
80% of the reason I watch porn is scat/pee:p and the thought of a hairy chick spreading her unshaven pits or snatch on my face gives me stainless steel wood. If she was a granny, we'd be moving to harder than SS wood. And if she wanted to have me serve as a bidet - diamond wood:cool: (yaa, I'm a sicko...)
What I don't like is too much yapping. If I want plot, I'll watch a non-porn movie.
manshimajin
03-26-2008, 08:45 PM
The 'Russian' model style - young women, bored out of their minds, plastic, mass produced look - awful, no glamour
leopards00
03-27-2008, 12:37 PM
good questions: there are honestly so many:
I put tatoos because simply put, they are trashy.
#2 in vintage mags newsgroups the big sloppy tits and fat chicks. for somereason this was a standard back in the day when alt.binaries.pinups was the place to go, it stunk. I dont see what the attraction is. gross in my opinion
3) falsies. thats a newer thing though, not in the vintage scene at all. they look silly, almost alient , like the ultra big sloppy cans from the vintage years.
Oswald
03-27-2008, 02:06 PM
1), Tattoos
2), Piercings (especially the tongue)
3), Feet
4), Bored models (there's lots of them about)
5), Zonked out models
6), Knickers pulled to one side
Bluesteve32
03-27-2008, 03:54 PM
I detest tatoos, especially those billboard some girls wear on the backs, or breasts. A small tatoo on an arm or leg is no so bad, but I really don't care for them.
Fake breasts - especially bad ones, totally shaved pussies, too thin (I am not a fan of skinny thighs and no butts), too many peircings (ears and maybe a navel ring), and fake redheads are among the turnoffs for me.
Genuine_Intrepid
03-27-2008, 04:10 PM
Hi there!
Newbie here but this poll caught my attention :D
There are more than one of the options that I could have voted for but I decided to go with underweight and over weight, simply doesn't appeal to me at all.
My biggest turn off of them all is the phenomenon of "airbrushing". For me it makes the women look like cartoon chariactures of women, and actually I think it is an insult to women because it is saying they aren't beautiful enough. I like to see women as they naturally look.
From the rear is also a turn-off, for me womens arses simply does nothing for me, and I like to to see them from the front better in all their splendour. I also dislike tanlines, if a woman is going to have a tan, then tan all over! Tatoos also get on my nerves, especially if they are all over, and piercings look horrible, except small ones in the navel and earrings. Fake tits also look bad, I like em natural no matter the size. :)
I realise that different people like different things, so in no way do I want to sound like I am criticising others for liking what I don't like. Different strokes for different folks I say. :)
trreeww
03-27-2008, 10:29 PM
I voted for other cause although some girls can be very pretty,but there often smiling ,which is just to mumsy for me :) and is mostly a turn off.
I prefer the nasty smile or pout which just says fuck me:p
mrhairsuit
03-27-2008, 11:52 PM
Shaved girls, fake breasts, tattoes and other "body arts" are definitely what i don't like. All i ask, as many here: natural women.
There's nothing worse than a totally shaved pussy and of course I prefer natural all around.
MH
don't like the whole tatoo thing on a chic pierceings either
wnyseek
03-29-2008, 03:30 PM
Too much body hair is a complete turn off, fake breasts is second
damp-patch
03-30-2008, 12:09 AM
Any form of fetish gear - masks, rubber clothing, ball gags, restraint apparel, chains, stupid costums, etc. is a complete turn-off for me.
johnmcwhatsit
03-30-2008, 12:15 AM
ron jeremy
naturalguy
04-10-2008, 07:50 PM
My turnoffs: preggos, lactating, lesbian scenes, bondage, anal, flat chests, fake tits (of course), anorexic models.
What PISSES ME OFF in pictures? Cropped pics or close-ups that omit the model's face - when I look at a pic I want to see the babe's face - otherwise, it's just another body (or pussy), so what's the point?
dalek
05-11-2008, 03:33 PM
This poll proves that we all have our own view of the world and that there is a fine line in porn between getting it right and getting it wrong.
I agree with those who dislike the models in porn who clearly don’t give a monkeys’ about trying to appear interested in their chosen line of work.
Candy Samples always had a real (apparent) enthusiasm for the job which is why I am a fan.
She also has (for me) the perfect enhancements to her boobs and seemed to have no pretensions. I like lots of make-up on a female and I’m surprised at how many contributors don’t like it.
On the other hand, Ava Devine is over the top with the way that she tries to sound keen and Patty Plenty always seems more interested in the camera crew that keeping her mind on the job.
However, the single most repulsive thing has got to be religious symbolism in porn!
Why do they do it?
I despise those images of models/”actresses” dressed as nuns.
Even those who leave crucifixes or other religious apparel around their necks make my skin crawl.
I often wonder how anyone in the real world could “get off” when I see bedrooms with the cross hanging over the bed (I’m non-catholic and was not brought up in a house full of holy pictures), maybe catholic’s don’t consciously see them but my libido reacts like a vampire at the sight of a porn model humping like a crack whore while a symbol of her religion is dangling around her neck.
What is that about?
I was traumatised by "The Excorcist" maybe thats why I cant take the link now!
Maybe worth starting a thread on why producers want to make porn and include religious imagery?
BigAl123
05-18-2008, 06:02 PM
Unfortunately, there are more than one turn off. It seems those of us here in the VINTAGE
Erotica Forum pretty much agree..................we prefer our ladies NATURAL!
These are NOT NATURAL
Shaved pubes......ANYONE who likes shaved pubes must be a pedophile. In my personal life, there is nothing hotter than , after some kissing and above the neck line and the waist line,
I get down to her pussy fur. When I see those hairs glistening in the sunlight, I gently blow some warm air on her pussy, and sure enough, drops of her love juices start forming and
dripping off the the ends. Guys, gals can fake a LOT of things, but when you see those pussy juices dripping , you know THIS GAL IS TURNED ON!! :::SLURPP:::
Tattoos..now I can tolerate a SMALL bird or single rose on back of shoulder , or upper hip, but
leave the beautiful area above your ass, your legs and of course your boobs, ALONE!
FAKE BOOBS ......The word fake says it all
Piercings ....... ears are OK, it stops there.
Regarding smoking, that is tough. No I would not marry a smoker. I'd like to think my spouse
is smarter than that & has the self discipline to quit if she did smoke. Now back in the day when many of our favorite gals were making films ( not tapes, films!) , smoking was much more common. Believe me, if I ever had a shot at any of they, Erica Boyer, Veronica Hart, Kay Parker, Annette Haven, Lisa DeLeeuw, etc. , and they wanted a smoke, I'd be sure to have a carton in my head board! lol!
countryscum
12-24-2008, 02:49 PM
turn off:
- nipple piercings (esp. rings)
- fake tits
- underweight women
- smoking
turn on:
- jewelry (gold or silver; necklaces, bracelets, rings, earrings, wirst watches: AWESOME!!!)
- big natural breasts
- 30-45 year old women are the best!!!
tattoos are cool, if they are well done. I don't like little dolphins, tribals or butterflies misplaced somewhere on the back.
ordenstaat
12-24-2008, 03:37 PM
Mine:
Fake boobs
Panties being pulled to the side (take the damn things off if you wanna show the goods!)
Badly put together or ill-fitting outfits
Ditto for underwear
billybunter
12-24-2008, 04:03 PM
Have to agree guys. Bald pussies?? wtf! Fake breasts ugh. And lack of lingerie. Top shelf mags these days are full of girls with nothing on apart from the hair on their head. I like the old look; sussies high heels (italian style) and pussy hair.
Fandingo
01-03-2009, 03:15 AM
I love beautiful matures smoking cork tipped or non-filters. Gets my goat every time. Think
Sophia Loren, Jayne Russell, Lee Carol, Teresa Orlowski, etc. Sorry Spade, but you have
Bogart, who smoked relentlessly, for your username pic yet you hate it? Are you a closet case maybe? I don't smoke much myself, don't want anyone else to either, but when I'm having sex I like to fire a strong one up and I like my females to do the same.
Fandingo
01-03-2009, 03:41 AM
I hate certain overdone cliched Hollyweird and Madison Avenue influenced interracial couplings, as well as the cliched lesbo scenes in every frikkin "hetero" flick. Give me variety
when it comes to fetishes like 70's on back. Since the 80's the industry's been pumping out formula (who's formulas, huh?) b.s., and quite frankly, most of it at this point is BOOOOOORRRRRIIIIIIINNNNNNGGGGG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
wallywanksta
02-07-2009, 08:52 AM
bad:
no full exposure, one or the other pics ex: a picture with a chick only showing boobs, no pussy. or the opposite.
wearing sunglasses
no smiles
shaved pussy
fake boobs
ugly chicks
ugly guys getting laid in porn ex: Ron Jeremy
good:
-idealisticly hairy: hairy from top of stomach down all the way to the pussy, then going back up the lower back. hairy ass cheeks, hairy ass crack. wish there were more pics of chicks with treasure trails, all they have are just triangles, which is cool, but would like more.
-chicks wearing jewelery, pumps as shoes, nylons, eye shadow, plaid skirts, secretary look, glasses, nails done, socks pulled up high, hippie chicks
-droopy boobs, natural; big, thick nippels
-farmers tans on the butt, pussy, and boobs which gives emphasis to those areas
-as for porn itself, 99% of the movies are boring. if the chick doesn't deepthroat, it isn't worth watching. the movies lack intensity and chicks talking dirty, Terri Wells does an ok job at talking dirty.
-i'd like to see more pissing, squirting categories in movies like jada fire
wallywanksta
02-07-2009, 08:54 AM
left something out that was good
one of the best scenes i've ever seen was this guy hitting a chick doggystyle, while another girl positioning herself right by the act. he took his schlong out and the other bitch gave him a bj. damn, talk about good.
dieseldude
02-07-2009, 11:16 AM
Fake boobs, piercings other than one per ear, smoking, and tats. Natural yes! Seems Like I'm in good company here.
Devius
02-07-2009, 01:34 PM
Fake boobs
Oh, and excessive tattoos...case in point
http://img136.imagevenue.com/loc1005/th_20844_1untitled8_123_1005lo.jpg (http://img136.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=20844_1untitled8_123_1005lo.jpg)http ://img241.imagevenue.com/loc166/th_20848_2untitled7_123_166lo.jpg (http://img241.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=20848_2untitled7_123_166lo.jpg)http://img12.imagevenue.com/loc962/th_20851_3untitled6_123_962lo.jpg (http://img12.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=20851_3untitled6_123_962lo.jpg)http://img130.imagevenue.com/loc952/th_20857_4untitled5_123_952lo.jpg (http://img130.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=20857_4untitled5_123_952lo.jpg)
http://img248.imagevenue.com/loc381/th_20859_5untitled3_123_381lo.jpg (http://img248.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=20859_5untitled3_123_381lo.jpg)http://img257.imagevenue.com/loc228/th_20860_6untitled4_123_228lo.jpg (http://img257.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=20860_6untitled4_123_228lo.jpg)http://img157.imagevenue.com/loc880/th_20861_7untitled2_123_880lo.jpg (http://img157.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=20861_7untitled2_123_880lo.jpg)
http://img158.imagevenue.com/loc63/th_20869_8untitled_123_63lo.jpg (http://img158.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=20869_8untitled_123_63lo.jpg)
:D
honeylove
02-07-2009, 04:23 PM
1. Excessive tattoos and piercings. I don't mind if you get a small flower or butterfly or heart on your ankle or other fairly inconspicuous spot. It's those gals with "tramp stamps", and more ink than bare skin who really look unattractive. Is that supposed to be sophisticated when you get some pseudo-spiritual gibberish on your lower back? As for getting your eyelids and cheeks pierced, that's just not cool. Self-mutilation is never sexy.
2. I've said it before, and I'll say it again: FAKE BREASTS ARE A TURNOFF! I'll take natural A-cups over fake D-cups anytime. Why do so many women keep thinking that getting big fake ones is sexy?
3. Being completely shaved bare. I like what I guess is called the "Brazilian" look, which is pretty much everything clean except for the "landing strip". There is just something not right about seeing a woman who is totally bare, like she's not healthy or something.
4. Too much makeup. A clean, natural look with just a bit of foundation and lipstick and eyeliner is good. Looking like you were shot in the face with a paint gun is not.
5. The use of toys. Sometimes, an occasional dildo or vibrator is okay, but it takes some of the glamour and sexiness away when a gal goes with the monster dildo in every photoshoot.
6. And last, but something that is a major turnoff, is women who are TOO BEAUTIFUL to be doing hardcore. There is something sad about a woman who is very cute, and very sexy, but who seems to have low-self-esteem and thinks that she has to do crude and vulgar things to be liked. When a true beauty sticks to glamour and non-HC work, it shows that she feels good about herself and knows what her boundaries are.
msjayhawk
02-08-2009, 12:07 AM
Add to the QUALITY:
Starting fully dressed and revealing a lot of lingerie on the way down, including bustiers, corsets, stockings, high heels...
Good color in the photography....
1024 or higher resolution.....
Properly enhanced breasts, like Summer or Angelique or Veronika....
Storyline if action....
Athletic looking like Crissy M or Ginger Lynn....
Exotic like Angelique or Anna Malle......
On a Bed!!!
Turn Offs or take away from the Quality:
Tattoos...
Piercings...
TOO Much Bush....
Bad boob jobs... Asia Carrera, etc. (sorry Asia, still love you:-)
640 pixel....
Beaches with sand shot... My wife and I almost killed each other in Tahiti and Virgin Islands that way!!! amazing how 1 grain of sand can screw a screw!!
No Stripping down...
Goofy Faces like playboy does... Bedroom fuck me look or nothing at all....
banquomerc
02-08-2009, 05:16 PM
Pleasure to read the comments and note differences; concerning MikeLCI's #6 "women that are too beautiful"-very interesting and it captures my frustration a bit, but it is not a turn-off, but comes close to this enigma with Bridgette Monet and how did she ever get even close to porn, much less strangers giving her facials. I've always wondered now that her kids are close to her age when she was in porn, how a parent would explain that (or try to bury it somehow in this electronic age). So, though not a turn-off, but a mystery that intrigues me about her and some others. I don't have the same questions over Seka or Christy Canyon as they seem perfect for porn;Monet (Dana Kunath) never seemed to belong yet she was there in all her glory so to speak.
Astatine
02-13-2009, 08:32 PM
I take silkman's point. I like women to look like women, curves and all. Bits that move when the action is in full flow and tits that roll to the side when a girl gets on her back. I'm not keen on girls loking into the camera ... too staged. Lots of the cntemporary porn seems to be in sanitised, anonymous settings, unlike the classic stuff, where the action tends to kick off anywhere (Hotesses de luxe being a case in point).
I'm ok with tattoos, if they're across the back, but I reckon an implanted vid screen showing the football would show how a guy could multitask - seeing to his bird and keeping up with their team of choice! Hell, I'd be moved to shag during a cup final at that rate!
Sharkhunter
02-13-2009, 10:05 PM
Turn offs?
Fake tits. No, no, no. Just wrong.
Tattoos. Nasty, I want to see pretty girls, not sailors.
Too many piercings - ears and belly-button (which can look cute) are just fine.
Overdone slap. Ugly.
Fetish/rubber gear. Not sexy.
Overfrilly underwear. It just looks rubbish.
Dinnerplate areolae. No thanks, though I do accept that some guys love this. Give me pert little nipples any day. Like Lisa Forward's...
Bazooka tits. No thanks.
Saggy tits. Erm. no.
Closeups. One is fine, but I want to see a girl's face. If I want to see a full page closeup of a pussy, I'd subscribe to Gynaecology Monthly
Speculums. One of my hates. As above - this shit belongs in a clinic, not in porn.
Tan lines. Ugh. These models can go to places where they can sunbathe nekkid, ffs!
Body fat. I prefer slimmer women, but curvy is fine. No bingo wings though - if I want that I'd buy one of those Granny mags.
Skin and bone. As above. Slim, but healthy. Not looking like they have emerged from a concentration camp.
Shaven havens. You cannot escape them these days, but please girls keep a little hair down there. I don't want a forest; a little strip or triangle will do just fine, and provide some sort of proof that you are not pre-pubescent.
Fake "fuck me big boy" faces. Not a turn on in the slightest. A natural smile works best.
Gaping arseholes. Why? Do I want to see your shit?
Fake cumshots. In some pics on some sites you can see that plastic attachment that the guy puts into his japseye to make it look like he is shooting his load - it's just shit, and you can spot it from a mile away. Then you see the gloops of glucose syrup, or whatever shit they use.
"Novelty" lingerie. It's just lame, laughable and not at all sexy.
I like the smoking thing though... Check out my Misha avatar lol :D
I can see now why I am so picky. I collect current images of around a dozen girls, and only one has a tattoo - Zuzana Z. That dolphin is tacky as fuck, but looking at the rest of her I can let it go. The good thing is that Club is more or less promoted itself as tattoo free (with a very few notable exceptions where they were included for effect) in that some popular tatted models like Natasha Marley have been completely airbrushed of their body "art" - the only time I would actually endorse airbrishing.
As such as I can easily knock one out over Natasha's pix in Club, but would be completely turned off if I had to put up with that shitty thing of her wrist and that nasty tramp stamp above her arse. Club has also zapped Zuzana's dolphin, which is top work.
uncle1966
02-13-2009, 10:53 PM
Fake Breasts A complete turn-off (I don't think women have ever consulted men, except for their money grabbing surgeons)
Natural breasts every time. I'd prefer flat chested over fakes though I love well endowed women. I prefer gravity effected to perky.
And women who have had their boobs sucked dry Yuck again!
Shaved Pussies Another complete turn-off. Looks like a child which is completely sick! When will this perversion pass, allowing women to return to showing natural hair?
I don't mind it thick and furious but not hairy legs.
Tatoos Are fine as long as they are few and well placed. Covering the whole body looks stupid on both sexes!
Fetishes Leather, plastic, tied up, hung from body piercings etc make me switch off.
Lesbians Do nothing for me. I know many enjoy this but I don't get it!
Body piercings Forget it!
Vibrators and sex toys Just get in the way! Can't see around them, can't see through them, don't care to see them at all!
I guess this thread illustrates why 'Vintage Erotica' is much more appealling over the fake crap they are spewing out these days! We obviously prefer the beauties of the past with their natural charms! ;)
msjayhawk
02-13-2009, 11:47 PM
Turn offs?
Fake tits. No, no, no. Just wrong.
Tattoos. Nasty, I want to see pretty girls, not sailors.
Too many piercings - ears and belly-button (which can look cute) are just fine.
Overdone slap. Ugly.
Fetish/rubber gear. Not sexy.
Overfrilly underwear. It just looks rubbish.
Dinnerplate areolae. No thanks, though I do accept that some guys love this. Give me pert little nipples any day. Like Lisa Forward's...
Bazooka tits. No thanks.
Saggy tits. Erm. no.
Closeups. One is fine, but I want to see a girl's face. If I want to see a full page closeup of a pussy, I'd subscribe to Gynaecology Monthly
Speculums. One of my hates. As above - this shit belongs in a clinic, not in porn.
Tan lines. Ugh. These models can go to places where they can sunbathe nekkid, ffs!
Body fat. I prefer slimmer women, but curvy is fine. No bingo wings though - if I want that I'd buy one of those Granny mags.
Skin and bone. As above. Slim, but healthy. Not looking like they have emerged from a concentration camp.
Shaven havens. You cannot escape them these days, but please girls keep a little hair down there. I don't want a forest; a little strip or triangle will do just fine, and provide some sort of proof that you are not pre-pubescent.
Fake "fuck me big boy" faces. Not a turn on in the slightest. A natural smile works best.
Gaping arseholes. Why? Do I want to see your shit?
Fake cumshots. In some pics on some sites you can see that plastic attachment that the guy puts into his japseye to make it look like he is shooting his load - it's just shit, and you can spot it from a mile away. Then you see the gloops of glucose syrup, or whatever shit they use.
"Novelty" lingerie. It's just lame, laughable and not at all sexy.
I like the smoking thing though... Check out my Misha avatar lol :D
I can see now why I am so picky. I collect current images of around a dozen girls, and only one has a tattoo - Zuzana Z. That dolphin is tacky as fuck, but looking at the rest of her I can let it go. The good thing is that Club is more or less promoted itself as tattoo free (with a very few notable exceptions where they were included for effect) in that some popular tatted models like Natasha Marley have been completely airbrushed of their body "art" - the only time I would actually endorse airbrishing.
As such as I can easily knock one out over Natasha's pix in Club, but would be completely turned off if I had to put up with that shitty thing of her wrist and that nasty tramp stamp above her arse. Club has also zapped Zuzana's dolphin, which is top work.
I agree with you mostly, but one of my fondest memories is off Ginger Lynn laying on her stomach with her ass up and the most incredible butt I had ever seen. Those tan lines are entrenched in my memory like iron rails:-)
CrimsonE
02-14-2009, 02:27 AM
Turnoffs:
Completely bare pussies: Those just creep me out
Execssively hairy pussies: The kind where you can't see the slit at all w/ all the hair
Nipple & Labial piercings: Asia carrera is about the only exception, because I find those types of piercings more distracting than erotic
Excessive inkwork: I don't mind a tattoo here and there, but the Illustrated Woman look that Janine and recently Kylie Ireland have adopted are just pathetic attempts to look hip. And the lower back tattoo has become so cliched these days, it's not even funny
Gaping assholes: To me, that is just plain disgusting
Bondage/S & M: OK to read about, but to watch it just is not a turnon for me.
Boob jobs that do not go with the body: Far too often, I see the females continue to inflate their tits to the point where they look just plain odd on their body.
Excessively skinny women: This goes double if they still retain their boob job. Ashlyn Gere used to be very hot, but in the late 90's and early 00's comeback, her
Strap-ons: To me, a lesbian scene should be about toungues and fingers, and an occassional toy. It's rare when I find a strap-on scene a real turnon
Gangbangs: Occassionally, with the right actress, scenes with more than 3 guys work, but usually, it ends up coming across as a mess
Orgies: This goes double for orgy scenes, in which there is just too much to follow
Diaper/baby fetish: I think someone who actually enjoys those types of scenes have some type of mental problems.
However, in many of those cases, a good attitude and a hot voice will override many of the physical turnoffs. Despite her turning herself into a parody, Kylie still gets me hot.
Turnons:
Tan lines: A good set of lines in the right spots can instantly get me hard. Shayla LaVeaux used to have a great set, as did Anna Malle and Raylin
Large natural breasts: A rarity in the business these days, but there are still a few out there, like Kelly Madison
A husky voice: Shayla, Anna Malle and Nikita Denise.
Good eye contact: A great porn star knows when and how to make eye contact with both the actor and the camera at the right times.
BTW, I don't mind fake breasts as long as the job is done right and they fit the body. At times they can be distracting if they're overly obvious (Tabitha Stevens being the worst offender), but they may still work quite well otherwise.
skylark72
02-14-2009, 02:48 AM
Fake Breasts, Tatoos, Pierced body parts [other than ears], shaved pubic areas. These turn me off completely. Women in all their natural shapes and sizes are the handiwork of the gods. Why spoil such beauty? You would not even contemplate painting a moustache on the Mona Lisa would you. No, Keep your body as it is intended by nature.
quacksacker
02-14-2009, 03:19 AM
For me it has to be piercings. Summer Cummings is one of my favorite big-titers, but the half pound or so of metal you'd have to get your dick past to fuck her is a big turn-off. I wasn't too crazy when I saw Summer sticking knitting needles into her arms either. I'm also kind of disturbed when I see a model dressed like a schoolgirl.
les1917lie
04-13-2009, 10:04 AM
Fake Breasts? - IMHO not done for men's benefit. Women "compete" for attention amongst other women. They also dress to compete with other women, not for men.
Body piercings? - "I don't have much personality, so these will ensure that I get some attention"
Shaved Pussies ? - The models in the movies do it, so I should too! (sheep also have a habit of doing what the others do, no mind of their own!)
What I really like in a woman? - "Understated elegance" , probably the sexiest woman ever? - Catherine Deneuve. NO fake breasts, NO tatoos, NO body piercings.
http://img225.imagevenue.com/loc58/th_03982_catherine68_123_58lo.jpg (http://img225.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc58&image=03982_catherine68_123_58lo.jpg)
floydfreak
04-13-2009, 04:49 PM
Yeah, tats ruin it for me. I'm not opposed to something small, say on the ankle or something, but hairline tats, butt crack tats, tit tats and the like mean an instant delete for me.
JudgeMental
05-17-2009, 05:42 PM
Cant stand a girl with blocky feet, speshly if they are in hosiery. Girl, if your feet aint a treat then dont show that meat, put em in a shoe or get them out of view!
Not a foot man you understand, more anti-foot but all ya'll out there that dig them trotters, keep on loving aint saying you're rotters.
:cool:
JudgeMental
05-17-2009, 05:46 PM
You said:
"probably the sexiest woman ever? - Catherine Deneuve. NO fake breasts, NO tatoos, NO body piercings."
- In that picture you posted she looks like a young Pauline Fowler off Eastenders to me!
Urr, would go with....
....can't think past my missus, I am way too critical! ;)
smallblock
05-17-2009, 06:50 PM
As others have said, fake boobs, tattoos and also the jelly mould type blond that just looks fake period.
tamsmith
05-17-2009, 09:21 PM
Tattoos. Just why do women get them. They cannot see them but in 10 years time they will want rid of them. Did someone say something about women and brains??
casiosk1
05-18-2009, 04:05 AM
Turn-offs: tattoos, piercings, silicone, heels, excessive make-up, "toys," shaved pubes.
Turn-ons: natural body hair, freckles, total nudity
eelcat
05-18-2009, 09:24 AM
LOL, I loathe looking at a humungous close up of some spread beef curtains and noticing a stray pube therein.....and/or stubble or shaving rash....and/or if hands are in said pic ugly unmanicured fingers...and/or a pimple in full view....and/or a wart on the chocolate starfish.
When viewing extreme close ups you do have to be very careful as not everything is perfect.
traderh
05-18-2009, 11:18 AM
women holding their breasts up to lick them....eeeewwwww!
BustyEscortLovr
05-22-2009, 06:41 AM
Those little piercings that look like a dressmakers pin has gone in leaving a ulcerated sore. Usually seen near the lip or side of the nose. Piercings are bad enough, but UGH.
That East European MILF Pandora is an example.
Smoking and tats are other turnoffs. (Although I would have a go with Janine Lindemulder in a New York minute)
JollyHumper
05-22-2009, 08:02 AM
Closeups, tattoos, closeup of mans face (What's the freakin' point!?!!), leather, piercings, oversized boobs. And what's the deal with an extreme closeup of a mans cum? I wan't to see bodies and boobs (and the rest). Completely turn off.
(What makes C*eCe* porn valuable, they most often let you see at least the torso of the woman during cumshots. Now, that's better.
Jolly :)
bawjaws
05-22-2009, 06:18 PM
agree with all you guys about tatts, metal, scat,fake tits , kipper lips,wigs etc etc but i would also add Pregnancy. Ok if it's done in a glamour style (kinda like the Demi Moore thing), but in porn... eewww.. especially if it looks like she's about drop
traderh
05-22-2009, 07:50 PM
knee high boots when there is a gap between the boots and the leg, really annoys me
bawjaws
05-22-2009, 08:22 PM
knee high boots when there is a gap between the boots and the leg, really annoys me
totally agree.. girls with skinny legs shouldn't wear boots
Tattoos, piercings, shaved cunts, plastic boobs, the usual stuff.
Women sucking on dildos; that's just silly.
Men slapping women's arses during sex. Of course, a good spanking if she has been naughty is another matter
Men slapping women in the face with their dicks.
So, that's why I like this forum.
FlyStrat
06-22-2009, 03:59 AM
This is deffinitively a passion-killer for me!
Girls with dark repairs are even worse than pierced nipples!
The Black Baron
06-22-2009, 04:05 AM
Big chunky shoes. I don't think they look sexy at all. Don't like platforms, whether made from wood in the 70s, or clear acrylic in the 90's. Classic pumps with stiletto heels just look so much sleeker and sexier.
Fat chicks. If that's your bag, more power to you, but it's not mine. Nor pregnant women, either.
For me, the golden age is from around 1990 until about 2000. Then styles started changing, shifting in other directions, too much 70s stuff creeping back, not just in porn, too, but everywhere. Just doesn't look as good.
PJayBr
06-22-2009, 02:57 PM
It's hard to know where to start without sounding like I don't do modern porn......
My dislikes : Tattoos, silicon, full shave jobs, multiple piercings, nail varnish, facials, shoes in bed, condoms in period pieces, women pulling really strange faces, women shouting obcenities during sex, grannies, any toilet based stuff, and probably more but I don't want to sound like I'm not a lover of the stuff.
Give me straightforward, honest looking porn everyday.
I hope there's a thread on here for what we would like to see, I'll have to go loking for it.
PJayBr
bullfinch
06-22-2009, 10:27 PM
Bad make-up
Fake facial expressions
Bad camera angles
Too many fully naked shots (much better if they start off fully clothed then you can fantasise about meeting them in real life...)
Not enough pussy hair
gte809h
06-25-2009, 02:38 PM
I especially hate belly button rings and tattoos. In particular the long belly button rings because it looks like pus is coming out of the belly button. And what is with everyone getting tattoos these days. Don't they realize that they are not very sexy and they're going to look especially ridiculous when your skin starts to sag as you get older.
oldtimefan
06-25-2009, 07:12 PM
I don't like the way that so many burlesque performers seem to all have many piercings, ugly tattoos, no curves whatsoever and brightly coloured hair, then they try to pretend to be the sensual full figured vintage girl... Frankly, she might as well be a man. I'm out.
mschaeffer33
06-28-2009, 05:56 AM
If Mexican hairless and inflatables were preferred by guys, wouldn't they have already been naturally selected?
Best ever comment on inflatables: steroid infested 50 yr old gym rat, who places 8th in his age group for Mr. Olympia every year, said to a pert young investment banker (36DD, 5 foot 2") on the adjacent Stairmaster, "Does your mother know you look like that?"
mschaeffer33
06-28-2009, 06:04 AM
totally agree.. girls with skinny legs shouldn't wear boots
totally disagree.... I start spraying on sight
mschaeffer33
06-28-2009, 06:07 AM
I especially hate belly button rings and tattoos. In particular the long belly button rings because it looks like pus is coming out of the belly button. And what is with everyone getting tattoos these days. Don't they realize that they are not very sexy and they're going to look especially ridiculous when your skin starts to sag as you get older.
these things are rad on a pretty girl ... single tattoos are excellent indicators that she will let you use your finger to take her temperature
sandyspain
06-28-2009, 11:11 AM
oh yeah...
Women who wear shoes or stockings when they fuck. Just looks uncomfortable.
Oh how very very wrong are you ;)
mikael726
07-07-2009, 09:38 PM
I hate tattoos , fake tits, airbrushed pics ,too much makeup. One thing I do detest is when the guy grogs on his partners pussy to lubricate it. F'kin horrible. What's wrong with a friendly lick. Also,the stupid,frantic "oh yeahs" when the girls are supposed to be coming.
piggypuff99210
07-07-2009, 09:51 PM
Fake breasts, tatoos, piercings, shaved beaver, false teeth
ballfan
07-08-2009, 02:38 PM
aI agree with the repultion at false breasts and tatoos but would like to ad that any hint of force used or duress on the part of the model is a turn off for me. the biggest turn are happy healthy bright eyed girls/women who are happy to show off.
angler12
07-08-2009, 03:44 PM
I dislike cock teasers that nearly show nudity, but never quite do. Sarah Michelle Geller, Alyson Hannigan and dozens of others spring to mind.
billhook
07-09-2009, 06:34 PM
Besides fake tits on women, I dislike hairy, unkempt pussies (trim it around the edges, please) and male pornstars with facial hair performing with female stars.
edgie_za
08-28-2009, 09:03 AM
Hate tatoo's, specially when they are on breasts or look like they cover 20% or more of the body. There is nothing sexier than a woman who has absolutely nothing artificial on her body, and tatoos just kills it for me!! Don't mind small, discreet tatoo's, but anything bigger it makes a woman look like a newspaper!
Also am turned off by very short hair, and even bald women, and extremely hairy pussies. Don't mind shaven havens, actually like it.
Also HATE women who have very short nails, and have nail polish on them, or even worse, chipped nail polish, the ultimate turn off for me. Either keep your nails long, or remove the nail polish and try again.
Smoking is a turn off as well, when ever I see a women smoking in a picture, I think of her as an ashtray, yeach!!
And my no 1 pet HATE, women who spit on dicks while giving a blow job!! WTF!!!!!
edgie_za
08-28-2009, 09:15 AM
Big chunky shoes. I don't think they look sexy at all. Don't like platforms, whether made from wood in the 70s, or clear acrylic in the 90's. Classic pumps with stiletto heels just look so much sleeker and sexier.
Fat chicks. If that's your bag, more power to you, but it's not mine. Nor pregnant women, either.
For me, the golden age is from around 1990 until about 2000. Then styles started changing, shifting in other directions, too much 70s stuff creeping back, not just in porn, too, but everywhere. Just doesn't look as good.
Disagree, I think Platforms are the ultimate in sexy footwear, specially clear ones :) Pumps are so "yesterday" :rolleyes:
Rolfe
08-28-2009, 01:32 PM
Tatoos and false boobs!!!
Giacson
08-28-2009, 04:47 PM
I gotta jump on the anti tattoo band wagon here. Never liked them, especialy on tits. They seem to be worn by the type of women who gets them for the extra attention yet gives you an ugly sneer when you're checking it out. The small ones dont bother me so much on the back of the shoulder or ankle. Its mid-body, wrap-around tats and sleeves I just dont care for. Cat paws making a trail across the body? Why? What I cant figure is why a woman so particular about having such a variety of clothes and shoes that she needs a warehouse to store them, likes something as permanent as a tattoo.
The biggest turn-off for me is the over zealous air brusher who has a fetish for manikins. It really pisses me off when they do it to a girl you've seen many times who's never needed such an extreme digital makeover. I WANT to see flesh tone, pores, freckles and all the tiny fine hairs. I've done quite a bit of this with Photoshop and anyone else who has knows these guys are just plain lazy. If editing is really a necessity, there are ways to go about covering blemishes without destroying overall skin tone. Its more time consuming but, you havent converted the model into a cartoon character.
I've also never been a fan of the "whores uniform". I mean to the extreme. Overdone hair and makeup, cat-in-the-hat stockings, skirt that should be more of a belt and 8in platforms.
A very funny bit by Dave Chappelle on the subject.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_uscmRI9ZrE
Mitch_M
09-08-2009, 05:19 PM
Breast Implants I especially hate seeing someone natural and then seeing her after implants.
Smoking No one is perfect. People have bad habits. But why do it on camera? I personally don't like it although I do understand that some people have a fetish for it.
Dirty Feet This adds a really cheap feel to the scene. Please don't remind me that your studio floor isn't clean. A damp soapy washcloth will do the trick.
Props In The Way In a few clips published by Naughty America I've seen actresses get their hair caught on fake plants used on the set. It's uncomfortable to see.
Costumes That Don't Fit If an actress keeps having to pull down a too small dress that keeps riding up, or pull up stockings that keep sliding down, again it adds a cheap feel to the scene and it's uncomfortable to see.
The Happy Ending I hate it when a scene ends with the man jerking off into the woman's mouth. A man can masturbate all by himself. I want to see the guy come from what the woman is doing, which happens often in older films and much less in newer videos.
I guess I said a lot. The biggest two are breast implants and dirty feet.
wallywanksta
10-06-2009, 07:58 PM
fake boobs, tatoos, pictures that don't fully expose everything, ugly chicks
seeing porn where a good looking chick is having sex with an ugly guy or vice versa
handcircle
10-06-2009, 08:39 PM
Models with bare legs, must have stockings to make a scene complete.
copernicus
10-07-2009, 06:14 AM
I may be in a minority but I dont actually like pictures of women lying on their backs, legs wide open. I find nothing erotic or sexually arousing about that. To me it looks more like they are having a gynocology exam.
MrHLayer
10-07-2009, 09:29 AM
Don't really have an issue with fake titties or tattooes – long as they're not excessive.
I can't stand long straight hair on a woman. It looks so bland and lifeless.
I don't like pig tails.
I don't like watching a woman licking a man's ass (yuuuuuuck!!!)
I don't like the trend depicted in modern porn of making the woman seem younger and younger. “Women not girls rule my world, I said they rule my world”!
I hate hate hate strangling, humiliation and out-and-out misogynistic degradation (e.g. Stamping on a woman's face – what the fudge?!:confused::mad:) I get the feeling the bloke and the director really hate women.
Don't like blokes that look directly at the camera (I'm talking about you Milf Hunter :mad:). In fact, I'd be quite happy if the man wore a brown paper bag over his head or at the very least shades.
I hate equally both communism and fascism. Sorry – wrong forum :o.
mellowyellow
10-07-2009, 04:02 PM
What would turn me off:
I don't like excessive and oversized tattoos, especially the big infamous 'trampstamp' on the lower back. God-awfull-invention...
http://cache.imagefap.com/images/thumb/33/634/634958797.jpg (http://www.imagefap.com/image.php?id=634958797)
Too many piercings not only gets a model in trouble with airport metaldetectors but it will result in loosing my interest,
http://cache.imagefap.com/images/thumb/38/852/852702167.jpg (http://www.imagefap.com/image.php?id=852702167)
Bored look accompanied by fake sound frequently generates a bored audience,
A general unpleasant, if not offensive, attitude, including chicks spitting on a cock between sucking will also make me get another DVD promptly.
http://pimpandhost.com/media/simple/1/788a1a98bb7b.gif (http://www.pimpandhost.com)
Models dressed as nuns, police, indians, cowboys, aliens etc. makes me switch of my DVD,
In general the average post-2000 female model (too thin, too spoiled, too straight hair, too bald pussy, too much of an attitude) will not excite me, notwithstanding their sometimes impressive sexual performance.
http://img216.imagevenue.com/loc111/th_48272_brianna3-01_123_111lo.jpg (http://img216.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=48272_brianna3-01_123_111lo.jpg) http://img211.imagevenue.com/loc198/th_48347_brianna3-07_123_198lo.jpg (http://img211.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=48347_brianna3-07_123_198lo.jpg)
Some sick male pornstars and producers that treat women like dirt will prevent me from having an erection and should be denied a work-permit instantly.
http://cache.imagefap.com/images/thumb/13/108/108615002.jpg (http://www.imagefap.com/image.php?id=108615002) http://pimpandhost.com/media/simple/25268/e776f0d26e24.gif (http://www.pimpandhost.com)
Like MrHLayer, I disgust scenes with women that lick male anusses.
Some 1980's (French?) photoseries look completely stupid because of the (MF) models constantly looking into the camera while having sex.
http://img105.imagevenue.com/loc431/th_00617_MX990913_123_431lo.JPG (http://img105.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc431&image=00617_MX990913_123_431lo.JPG)http://img105.imagevenue.com/loc336/th_00368_MX990904_123_336lo.JPG (http://img105.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc336&image=00368_MX990904_123_336lo.JPG) http://img266.imagevenue.com/loc488/th_00605_MX990905_123_488lo.JPG (http://img266.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc488&image=00605_MX990905_123_488lo.JPG) http://img184.imagevenue.com/loc1178/th_00612_MX990909_123_1178lo.JPG (http://img184.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc1178&image=00612_MX990909_123_1178lo.JPG)http://img145.imagevenue.com/loc739/th_00609_MX990907_123_739lo.JPG (http://img145.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc739&image=00609_MX990907_123_739lo.JPG)
And on film it's often the average post-2000 female model (again: too thin, too spoiled, etc.) that will look into the camera to much..
http://pimpandhost.com/media/simple/1/79e82bce41bf.gif (http://www.pimpandhost.com)
Also, mackerel with chocolate can be pretty awfull too...
Oswald
10-07-2009, 04:28 PM
I swear I don't understand the hatred of shaved pussies. I know this is a vintage board, but... It's just about her feeling more sensation on her pussy when she gets eaten out, not pedo stuff.
I'm in agreement with you here - although I suspect we're in the minority on this subject.
I'm interested in seeing her puss lips and that's best viewed when the puss is shaved/waxed properly.
When I write 'properly' I'm referring to the models who badly attempt to shave their puss and fail. This results in straggling hairs around the Khyber Pass area. :eek:
If they cannot shave properly they shouldn't bother in the first place.
20late
10-07-2009, 05:01 PM
Unlike most of you, I don't objectify women. I have my fetishes, but I like all women - tattooed or not; fake or real breasts (any size); plastic surgery or au naturel; shaved or hirsute; skinny or fat; young or old; vintage, modern or post modern; deviant, sadomasochistic, neurotic, psychotic or balanced. Women go through hell to please men, to appeal to men, to satisfy men. And all you guys can do is bitch about it like women owe you more.
But then, that's just my honest opinion.
.
plushpig
10-07-2009, 09:20 PM
I'll go along with everyone who cites tatoos (tho piercing dont bother me) & especially fake boobs.
prime example: Deuxma -a truly gorgeous looking woman but those ridiculous hemispheric tits...ugh!
darkangels6969
10-09-2009, 04:33 PM
Some 1980's (French?) photoseries look completely stupid because of the (MF) models constantly looking into the camera while having sex
I agree with you 100%. That's a total turn-off for me, but there's something that's even worse: models looking into the camera and smiling like they are posing for a class photo! That's why I avoid Silwa mags like the plague. ;)
tamsmith
10-09-2009, 06:46 PM
I'm in agreement with you here - although I suspect we're in the minority on this subject.
I'm interested in seeing her puss lips and that's best viewed when the puss is shaved/waxed properly.
When I write 'properly' I'm referring to the models who badly attempt to shave their puss and fail. This results in straggling hairs around the Khyber Pass area. :eek:
If they cannot shave properly they shouldn't bother in the first place.
Well said my man. I could not have said it better. Ta.
brfbne
10-24-2009, 03:43 AM
When an attractive woman gets a tattoo, breast enlargment or body-piercing, or shaves or plucks her hair extensively, she is as good as saying she has:
a) A low opinion of herself and her body; and/or
b) Some very serious issues; and/or
c) The intellectual capacity of a block of wood
I occasionally hear women say things like "I want to celebrate my birthday by going out and getting a really nice looking tattoo." What idiots. Tattoos only look nice to the people who get paid to apply them, and to the women who think they are special in some way because they have them. How stupid can you get. It is like going back to the Stone Age. Talk about rejection of civilisation.
carlmeistr
10-24-2009, 03:55 AM
I think some this is our fault. Men on their own have there own likes and dislikes, have you ever found a woman attractive / cute, but been embarrassed to admit it? I think the current standard of beauty turns into the big breasted (fake or not) barbie doll cult, when you get a group of guys together. They all start thinking (collective consciousness) that Pamela Anderson or latest Rock of Love skank is the hottest thing. Or that why are the women in the Miss America pageant are virtually interchangeable.
msjayhawk
10-24-2009, 10:45 PM
Unlike most of you, I don't objectify women. I have my fetishes, but I like all women - tattooed or not; fake or real breasts (any size); plastic surgery or au naturel; shaved or hirsute; skinny or fat; young or old; vintage, modern or post modern; deviant, sadomasochistic, neurotic, psychotic or balanced. Women go through hell to please men, to appeal to men, to satisfy men. And all you guys can do is bitch about it like women owe you more.
But then, that's just my honest opinion.
.
Too funny!!! I mean that by the irony of your post....
You are saying this on a website that is about FILM and PHOTOS of women. This is "Objectification" in it's purest form. So one, you are at an objectification of women website, and two, you are at a post titled "Turn offs in photos" which is where people who wish to voice (or bitch) turnoffs about photos do it. Do you get it??? It is kind of like going to a brothel, seeing a sign on a door that says "S&M", going in and saying "half the people in there were getting beaten or spanked!"
You made my day....
candle
11-01-2009, 12:45 PM
Dirty arsehole, come on she is getting paid well above what others earn, yet some do not wash.
Men, penis, male ejaculation
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.....
buttsie
12-09-2009, 04:47 AM
This is pretty simple
Ugly Women
prolapsed rectums, haemorrhoids, scat, sex with animals, sex with midgets, tears of pain, silicone overdose, rubberboat lips, rings on every finger, club svntn headband, bad hair, too much hair, multiple piercings at same body part, childish outfits, small hands, low resolution images, bad scans, fisting (extreme insertions), untidy rooms :D ...
mellowyellow
12-09-2009, 05:09 PM
...club svntn headband...
Agreed!!
Untidy rooms....LOL! But I agree!
prolapsed rectums, haemorrhoids, scat, sex with animals, sex with midgets, tears of pain, silicone overdose, rubberboat lips, rings on every finger, club svntn headband, bad hair, too much hair, multiple piercings at same body part, childish outfits, small hands, low resolution images, bad scans, fisting (extreme insertions), untidy rooms :D ...
nevermind
12-10-2009, 05:06 PM
Tattoos EEK!!!! :eek:
shig1
12-10-2009, 06:33 PM
i hated painted fingernails
Dreamer
12-12-2009, 12:28 AM
Women with ugly faces, hairy legs or forearms(I dont't care about hairy armpits much), tatooes. Not "regular" things like dwarves, amputees, heavy S & M, blood.
bockster
12-13-2009, 07:09 AM
In movies or especially pictures, it's got to be a mans hairy ass staring back at the lens.
This common trend of a man getting his ass licked for film has got to stop, he might enjoy it but i sure as hell don't want to watch it, TAKE NOTE ROCCO, we want to see a womans gorgeous big beautiful round ass to drool over so get yer fookin ass out the way.
natedogbfd
12-21-2009, 08:45 PM
unclean butt-hole
anything that looks like residual jizz from the last guy that fucker her
really hair armpits and pussy
military/male type outfit
that's my dislike list in that order.
nevermind
12-21-2009, 10:01 PM
I'm not that picky...
But some things i really don't like:
- Tattoos
- Fake breasts
- Naked, wearing tennis shoes
- drawing attention.
- pointing up middle finger
- yelling
- neglected condition in general
Believe i once posted a pic of Jo Guest, pointing up her finger.
But she did it in a very convicing way i guess.. :rolleyes:
BustyEscortLovr
12-22-2009, 12:52 AM
Tattoos, esp on the breasts.
Navel and nipple piercings - I don't care for the taste of metal!
Piercings in general - most of the time they look ulcerated - YUCH.
Smoking
lithium3
12-22-2009, 09:46 AM
for some reason, I don't mind the bigger girls (Kira Rodriguez) as much as I do the WAY too skinny ones (if I can see ribs, it's going in the trash...looking at you, Mya Mason)
...but to be different, my zipper flies up pretty damn quickly when the women are asked to reach WAY too far 'that' role, usually resulting in cheesy (yes; even for porn) dialogue or even godawful, phony accents. Anyone seen Ava Devine in Border Bangers with the 'ay si papi' routine? sheesh.
....and finally; the chatterbox, overgrunting stuntcock that forgot he's a stuntcock.
dorcelfan
12-22-2009, 10:38 AM
For me in pics and movies they are:
1. Spitting! when was that EVER a turn on? The scene is instantly ruined and I move on.
2. Excessive tattoos - some are nice and look ok but those big huge "buliders" tats? Noooooo!
3. Silicone.....nuff said.
4. Massive plumped up lips - collagen has it's place in life.
5. Any form of toiletry practice....I know some get a kick but WTF?
6. Screaming and wailing like a stuck pig....we know it doesn't happen so put a sock in it...
7. Treating women like some f*ck piece and abusing them.....vile and uncalled for. Sorry but if you think it's a turn on then something is wrong with you.
8. Tights.
9. long, uneeded close-ups of the act - much better from a distance for me as I'm not keen on looking at some blokes ring-piece and watching the last chicken at Sainsburys banging in and out.
10. Massive 10-on-1 gang bangs. It makes for uncomfortable viewing...refer to point 7!
So after all that - Merry Christmas all!
Regards
D
WantFullBush
12-26-2009, 07:23 PM
You all said it on my behalf: tattoos, piercing, fake tits, women treated badly in BG materials, dildonics.
A couple of my own:
In photos:
- I absolutely hate it when a girl is in the doggie pose but her butt cheeks are covered by a scarf, blanket, towel, piece of clothing or bed sheets. This was very frequent in the 70s and the 80s. Luckily the photographers stopped doing it. I never understood what the F was the point of covering the girl's butt cheeks. You don't cover her breasts again after she has taken off her clothes, do you?
- Awkward stand-up poses.
- A girl that has an ass to die for but is not posed doggie style in any of the pics (while another, basic pose is repeated in 5 or 10 pics).
- Forced girlie smiles.
In videos:
- The girl putting clothes back on, esp. panties, after she has taken them off. This was very frequent in Pl@ybore vids, and Benth0use was guilty of this malpractice a couple times, too. I mean, the purpose of the video is to gradually arouse the viewer. Why the F decrease the arousal level by putting clothes back off?
- Lousy camera work not filming the right thing at the right time from the right angle. Like in one Benth0use video in which Miel Angel is parting her thick meaty pussy lips with her fingers, but the camera takes it from an angle which prevents you from seeing the action (this was already late 1990s or even 2000+ and this type of explicitness was allowed).
- Editting that results in 2-second pussy shots and 12-second shots of plants in the corner, pieces of furniture, or kitchy room decorations (Benth0use vids used to show a lot of this crap).
- Slow build-up, a very short finale and an abrupt end (Benth0use again)
- Jumping forward to the next scene and jumping back to the current one (Andrew Blake's signature invention. While he should receive the Congretional Medal of Honor for his film-making, he also deserves a kick in the butt for this unwelcome distraction).
Shy Talk
01-01-2010, 10:55 PM
Lesbian sets......what a waste
Fake hardcore sets a la Jo Guest's .....Jo is a goddess on her own, so fake sex act pictures are just daft!
Short haired or permed girls
Black and Latin girls - before anyone screams about racism.....I'm not keen on redheads either but love pics of asian / oriental girls
Big tits real or fake
The majority of outdoor sets....they look ridiculous, when would you EVER see such a thing? and for me erotic pics are about suspension of disbelief
PVC leather whips chains etc etc......I'm a lace and satin kind of guy
All of the above 'in my opinion' by the way!
I am pretty reasonable when it comes to women posing, but I, like so many in this thread, cannot stand seeing women smoking cigarettes. I can, however, make exceptions for cigars since those are usually done more as props and usually don't indicate that the woman actually smokes in real life.
One thing setting wise that turns me off is placing a pictorial in a bathroom, particularly around a toilet. There is nothing more of a turn off than seeing a toilet in a picture when it is the complete antithesis of romance and exotic appeal.
peteyboy
01-02-2010, 08:26 AM
Shaved girls, fake breasts, tattoes and other "body arts" are definitely what i don't like. All i ask, as many here: natural women.
Agree, also not the topic here, the slapping and spitting and those ugly shoes.
eye94102
01-08-2010, 12:14 AM
1. Close ups of the guy - esp. when I'm shooting my wad at that instant
2. Spitting - guys, pause the camera and apply lube if you have to then start shooting again..but please, no spitting!!
3. Endless girl-on-girl action - yeah, I can relate to that well
4. Guys getting rim jobs - Doesn't belong in straight porn
5. Hairy pussies - to each his own, my preference is bare smooth
6. Condoms - I know it's not PC, but wtf??
7. No cum shot - Is it THAT hard to include one?
8. Repeated looped scenes - distracting and redundant
9. Piercings on tongue, and esp. clit - I move on no matter how pretty the girl is
dhream
01-08-2010, 02:22 AM
Many posters here said fake tits are a turn-off. Clearly, there is a market for them, and quite often the women themselves get them (I mean everyday women, not just porn stars) because they are unhappy with what nature provided, and we all know the lengths, expense, and discomfort women go to for 'beauty', even if we'll never understand, in some cases, 'why' (see below). Many in the 'industry' who do it are on the dance circuit and claim their earnings rocket (sorry!) after they get a rack fitted.
As a rain-coater with an Asian, er, slant, I'm ambivalent to say the least! I hate Kitty Yung's new tit-bits, but love the cartoonish extreme of that other Korean porn star, Minka!
Most starlets get bolt-ons sooner or later if they stick around. (Even Cumisha Amado at nearly fifty did it!) she still escorts, but I think her porn days are over.
I know a lot of you dislike Cumisha intensely, but I will say this; she is a stayer (started at around 35 yo in porn) and... as she put on weight with age, her new tits actually balance out her beefier body quite well, she has, also to her credit, kept in shape, she's plump but not flabby. Don't forget this lady is into her fifties now, 54 this year I think, and still VERY highly regarded for her GFE services on the incall circuit in LA.
Another Asian (now sadly out of the biz) is Suzi Suzuki, who's bolt-ons IMO improved her, whereas the once hot Kitty Yung now looks as fake and grotesque as the majority who beat a path to the surgeons door (why did you mess with your sexy oriental eyes Kitty? Some cinita chicks need it, you didn't. You 'Jacksonized' your looks, a crying shame!)
So for me bolt-on tits are not always a turn-off, but smoking? Ughh!
And piercing, and some tattoos (depends) and gratuitous abuse, but....
...then again... among the now underground 'ins*x' tapes of hardcore S&M, one in particular, is to me, the ultimate in deep erotica... I also find it quite disturbing, but the woman -I also happen to know- was a frequent 'guest' model, so it's not like she signed up once and they went over that line against her will. But I digress, sorry!
PS: Someone earlier posted that "if you like abuse there's something wrong with you" well, at school in my day we were caned on the buttocks for misdemeanours. While being caned myself is something I do not find at all appealing, I do find women being caned hard intensely arousing, therefore I agree that I must have been 'damaged' by my school experiences and apply to caning what the shrinks call transference and sensualisation in order to deal with my own trauma. Just my opinion on why I find some 'abuse' arousing, offered without apology.
Alvin Lucifer
01-08-2010, 02:26 AM
It depends for me the style of the piercing or the tattoo. If it's on a porn industry girl straight from the Vegas strip joints, I probably won't dig it. It's likely to look garish, cheap, and graceless. If it's on a nice art school girl or a sweet old dyke, then it'll probably turn me on!
Definite turn-offs:
Artificially enhanced breasts. I like tits of all kinds. Furthermore, I'd rather see a natural breast lax with age than a pair of flesh-colored basketballs under a 50-year-old neck.
Bad sets. No, not what I just addressed above, but those cheapo porn stages that look like they fold up into a trailer at the end of the day.
Goofy makeup. I don't mind slutty makeup, but lopsided lipstick application, eyeshadow the color of tropical fish, and fake nails that look like a bag of hard candy don't do it for me.
The landing strip. I like full-bush or completely shaved. the landing strip or the rectangle are neither here nor there, and please, no sports logos!
Scat. No way. Pee is fun if I'm in the mood to see it, but ladies only please.
More man than woman. I don't mind m/f pics, but I'm strictly hetero, so the composition needs to emphasize the woman's body and the woman's sexual pleasure. I don't like a gang shot where you can't see the gal for the man meat.
Man ass. As above.
Fake bondage or S&M. It just looks silly, not sensual. I have watched real sadistic cruelty, but I did it out of morbid fascination rather than pleasure.
Big logos. Chances are its for a lousy pay site and, obviously, the porno imprimatur has never deterred anyone from ganking the pic.
Porn industry footwear such as thigh-high boots and clear platform heels.
Transvestite/transexual. If that's your thing, groovy. A good friend of mine is into that scene. Again, as a strict hetero, it doesn't do anything for me.
Conversational captions are dumb but speech bubbles are obnoxious.
The bachelorette party and frat sex themes. It's not exciting because it's fake. It's an industry genre. Like professional wrestling, people still seem to think that crap is real.
Racially hostile themes.
Food. Food is for eating, not for inserting into vaginas or rectums, and I don't care what a cucumber is shaped like. I once saw a woman pouring Coca-Cola into her pussy. WTF? You want a yeast infection you could bake a wedding cake with?
Beastiality. No. Just no. Total gross-out.
Abuse. If the person did not consent to the act or cannot legally consent to the act, I don't want to see it.
Video only turn-offs:
As above and...
The cheapo videos where it's some bozo with a cheap camera and a couple of hookers or dumb college girls. I especially hate it when the guy with the camera tries to talk dirty or conducts a bogus narrative. Talk about dorky.
Overt racism ala Spring Thomas.
Shitheels misogyny ala BangBus.
Amateur is great but at least learn how to use the goddamn camera before shooting a video! Otherwise, you get blurry, wobbly footage with vapor trails, excessive ambient or incidental noise, or the lens pointed at the ceiling while you try and figure out what the hell you're trying to do!
Crappy storylines, such as poolboy, pizza deliveryman, pay-the-rent, buddy's seductive mom, horny girls' study lab, and so forth.
Orgasms that sound like a Speak-and-Spell getting off.
Mr. Nice Guy porno -- what Ed Powers used to.
Mr. Sadistic Asshole porno -- other side of the coin from Ed Powers, such as Max Hardcore, who's in the slammer where he belongs.
Bogus lesbian revenge theme -- Girl caught shoplifting or screwing another girl's boyfriend gets sexually tormented.
Long blowjobs. Even if the woman is really good at it, there's only so long I want to look at a guy's cock.
Idiotic-sounding male utterances. I'm know I've made 'em myself, but it doesn't follow that I want to hear another guy going, "Ooh yeah, baby, ooh yeah, baby!" over and over, and those uvular grunts get comical.
Lastly, if a woman looks like she had to get drunk or high to make the scene, I feel depressed.
dhream
01-08-2010, 02:57 AM
Mr. Nice Guy porno -- what Ed Powers used to.
Mr. Sadistic Asshole porno -- other side of the coin from Ed Powers, such as Max Hardcore, who's in the slammer where he belongs.
Lastly, if a woman looks like she had to get drunk or high to make the scene, I feel depressed.
alvinlucifer,
Ed Powers has what women might call the 'Creep factor' in spades. His porn was never my cup of tea, but he had the balls to make it, and made it big in the process, while fucking a ton of hotties and amassing a huge personal collection of porn for fun and profit, for that I salute him. I'm not disagreeing with you, just recognising this dude beat all the odds!:)
Max is in stir? I never knew! What did he get done for, being tediously purile?
His work is an example of how to waste willing talent with pointless and juvenile sexual abuse. Good riddance!
I've never been able to spot a woman whose been high or drunk in a porn movie, maybe I should stay in more. Oh! there was one early Seka threesome where they all got stoned on camera! That seemed more like them just having a dirty fun time than an analgesic exercise!
I agree that coercion under any circumstances is 'crossing the line'.
Some Eastern bloc "S&M" I have seen is just brutal criminal assault on tape.
The US made genuine hard-core S&M product (as opposed to gonzo abuse and degradation) usually has a clear element of consent and 'time-out' opportunities involved in the taping process that is transparent.
Ghaleon
01-08-2010, 03:11 AM
What makes a bad picture in my opinion ?
Well ....
Tattoos - Small tattoos in discreet places are okay, but no "tramp stamps" or turning your body into an art canvas.
Piercings - For the most part earrings only, but discreet belly button ones are okay.
Fake Boobs - A little enhancment is okay, but don't overdo the silicone.
Bodily Excretions (Piss/Scat) - A big NO WAY on this. Save that for the bathroom and don't take the camera with you. Yuck !
Porn Heels - Any footwear with soles thicker than a 1/4" are a big turn off and it doesn't matter what color they are. Besides, how can any model walk in them ? Give me a classic stiletto with a 5" - 6" heel any day.
Bare Legs - It's nylons or no dice.
Using Food as a Toy - Just plain gross. Nuff said.
Logos - I understand copyrights and all, but do the have to be so big as to be a distraction from the model.
Abuse - No way, no how.
Trannies - If that's your thing more power to ya. It's a big turn off for me.
To Quick to Strip - I like a little tease in my sets not a few pics fully clothed and then fully nude.
Extreme Close Ups - If I wanted to see this I would go to medical school. Also any gynecological sets are best left alone.
Beastiality - Don't even think about going there. Sick. Just plain sick.
M/F Ratio - I want to see more of the woman not some fake stud and his dick.
Hair - It is on the head. Not the armpits, legs, or pussy. I will accept a well trimmed and groomed small patch but nothing you have to use a scythe to cut down. Also, the carpet had better match the drapes.
All of these also apply to vids with these add-ons.
Music - Some soft background is fine but don't crank your speed metal to 11.
Story - Unless it's a solo performance, hire a writer or three to make a coherent plot. It works.
Bored Performances - Self explanatory.
Camera Work - Learn how to use one. Jerky movements and such just make me ill. Also don't linger on anyone shot for too long.
Corny Dialogue - Do I need to explain ?
If you can avoid all these pitfalls, your doing alright in my book.
Ghaleon
Legsman
01-08-2010, 03:21 AM
-I'm glad a few mentioned dirty feet, that includes the bottom of dirty socks and the bottom of dirty stockings as well.
-Girl's who look like they have acne all over their ass. If I see a whole bunch of pimples all over an ass, I start thinking unclean ass.
-I can handle a hairy bush, but that's about it. Hairy legs just look manly to me. Hairy armpits looks very unclean to me. However, I can love a girl with a tiny little bit of peachfuzz on their ass. Go figure. Just fuzz, nothing more.
-Bad photography gets my goat. Sexy legs with the feet cutoff just kills the legshots. No, I'm not a foot guy, but feet whether naked or in nice heels, or classic pumps just makes LEGS look better! Hate the boots, pvc stuff and 11 inch heels. You just can't do better than classic pumps and sandals!
-Women who don't know how to pose legs. Flipper-footing never looks good. Learn how to point those toes! Make those calves arch!
-Boney Legs, I'd rather see a flat chest with great legs, then nice breasts and no legs and no ass.
-I understand depth of field in photography, but showing crystal clear pussy and the same pic has the face blurred out just loses it for me. We're only talking a distance of about 3 feet apart. Do you really need to convey distance on me? I wanna see her face and pussy clearly!
-Plastic scenes with posed shots in plastic atmospheres and plastic props. The hottest pics I ever see always include natural women, looking natural not posed, looking natural getting fucked, in a natural room with nothing perfectly placed. Just like we got home from a club, went right to the couch and started banging. The more real the scene looks, the hotter the pics! Who poses when they're doing it?
-Real hot girls who do not get naked, or only show their boobs. If you're already showing boobs, you might as well show it all? If you're being bad, be bad. Go all out. Unless you're the ultimate in cheesecake/tease, I don't see how keeping yourself 80% covered with a boob sticking out for the entire pictorial is going to do for those of us dying to see the rest.
Alvin Lucifer
01-08-2010, 04:24 AM
DHREAM:
I'd be lying if I said I didn't envy Ed Powers just a bit...and he didn't have one of those giant porno schwang's that'd make you feel insecure! Thing is he used to go overboard on the interview portion. I don't care what a chick's favorite breakfast cereal is unless I'm shacked up with her! Anyway, Powers managed to get himself HIV+, which is always a risk in the business. Sorry, Ed, that's a bummer. I just hope he didn't pass it along to anybody else.
Yeah, Max Hardcore is went to prison on obscenity charges, which is really difficult to do in the U.S. nowadays, except if the accused was abusing minors. Max Hardcore did pay models of legal age to portray minors, the legality of which is not yet settled. I say it is within First Amendment protection under the U.S Constitution, even if the portrayal is repulsive to the general public. When the issue came up in court cases, First Amendment activists have a raft of examples in mainstream cinema, such as the scene in "Traffic" (1998) in which an actress playing a 16-year-old drug addict is shown having sex with her dealer. Anyway, according to Wikipedia: "Paul F. Little (Max Hardcore) is still prisoner number 44902-112 and due to be released May 29, 2012.[12] Little is now being held at The Federal Correctional Institution (FCI) - La Tuna in Anthony, Texas, a low security correctional facility for men."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Hardcore
http://boingboing.net/2008/10/07/adult-film-director.html
Basically, Max Hardcore went to prison because the federal government hated him enough to find a way to get him. They got him on a technical records-keeping charge. Onerous record-keeping requirements were imposed on pornographers under far-right Attorney General John Ashcroft. MH is appealing the ruling, but I don't think the circuit court in Georgia will overturn the case, and our Supreme Court has gotten so conservative, I doubt they would even hear the case.
A few other pornographers went to jail over the records-keeping law (see the Wiki article) and I don't think those decisions were just. By all accounts MH was extremely careful to make sure there were no minors and no drugs anywhere even near his sets. So I think the court's decision was getting a bad man in a bad way, which doesn't make it right. I know MH was a sadist and some of the participants in his productions got more than they bargained for -- in other words, I think MH could have gotten convicted of rape and aggravated assault if the victims could prove any of the depicted acts were nonconsensual. However, MH could afford a lot more and better legal counsel than any of the poor sluts that would agree to work with him, so the women didn't take him to court. Thus, I don't feel sorry for MH.
Anyway, back on topic, dirty feet never bothered me. I'd rather see dirty feet than clear heels! However, dirty ass is a gross-out. I mean, you gotta expect excremental traces even when its freshly shaved and waxed. Asshole is asshole. But when there's fresh seepage and dingleberrries ---eeeyecccch!!!
mingrey
03-05-2010, 08:30 PM
How many times have I come (ahem) across a new picture set of a girl I really like the look of, i.e. nice brunette wearing short skirt and suspenders, and the first few photos are pretty nice, but the rest of the set is ruined by the girl clearly wearing her suspender belt straps OVER her knickers, as in case of Tori Black below:
http://img241.imagevenue.com/loc543/th_23092_156_123_543lo.jpg (http://img241.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=23092_156_123_543lo.jpg)
(By the way, I think Tori is great.)
In my little fantasy porn world, how am I gonna get those knickers off without first taking off that suspender belt and unhooking the suspenders??! And then where's the fun in that?!!
Sequence for a lady putting ON her undergarments should be:
1 - suspender belt
2 - suspenders
3 - hook up suspender belt to suspenders
4 - pull on knickers
While I'm here, another gripe is photosets where the girl has a great outfit to start out with, i.e. high heels, suspenders, knickers, skirt, bra, blouse, but when removing said items, leaves her knickers on 'til last. In my view, sequence for a lady removing her clothes should be:
1 - knickers first
2 - not too bothered about 2 onwards...
jk666
03-05-2010, 09:37 PM
Sneakers/Tennis shoes
Smoking - I know it can look sexy but I still think it's disgusting
Gym Equipment
Sharkhunter
03-06-2010, 12:30 AM
This is a great thread, and I just wish those folks in the industry - and the chicks that work in it to provide us with all the pictorial pleasure - would too.
Before starting on listing the negatives, to me what I find hot is fairly simple. Natural, pretty girls with no tattoos or unsightly piercings. Solo, g/g, b/g - I don't care. So long as I get to see the pretty girl in all her glory.
So, turnoffs. Let's start with the obvious ones.
Fake tits. An absolute non-no for me, and the only one I have been able to tolerate - because she has a gorgeously pretty face and the fakies are not too bad - has been Katka Henesova. Other than that I find no reason why a girl who I might find attractive (I do have fairly high standards) might wish to "augment" herself in this manner. The worst examples of pretty girls doing this include Veronica Simon, Nella (Jana Miartusova) and Teagan Presley. I once felt up a girl with fake tits - when ran my hand over what felt like a golf ball in a sock I felt a bit queasy. So, no. No. No. No.
Tattoos. Again, why make yourself look like a pirate? Do this chicks even think about what they might look like when they are a little older? Most of the time if I am interested in checking out a photoset and see a tattoo, my interest ends there and then. She has to be exceptional for me to overlook the ink, and so far only one girl has passed - Zuzana Zeleznovova, for him I can forgive that supremely tacky dolphin that looks as though it has been designed by an amateur. Tramp stamps, anything on the back - no thanks. I know one of my all-time faves Sophie Moone has a butterfly tat on the back of her neck, but from what I can tell it was something she wanted for herself, not something to market to her fans. If she didn't announce it none of us would know as she never shows it off.
Piercings. It's ears only for me, though a cute navel piercing can look right a lot of the time. I can forgive a tongue piercings as hopefully she'll be keeping her mouth closed most of the time. Pierced clits can also be sexy. Other facial metal is definitely out, and nipple rings are a puke-inducer for me. Ugh.
Penis closeups. No thanks, unless it is quite clearly up a girls pussy or arse or in her mouth. Same goes for gurning males prior to shooting their bolt. It's the girl's body I want to see, not some dude's ready-to-shoot cock.
Make-up overkill. Yes, a girl can look hot with the right application of cosmetics, but blusher that makes you look like Pennywise and eyeshadow that creates that panda look? No thanks.
Crappy clothing. College outfits, office gear or just a simple sweater and miniskirt combo does it for me. Less of the overly elaborate "sexy" clobber please - it just looks cheap and nasty. Ditto crotchless knickers and leather gear - the latter does nothing for me, and when I want to see a chick's cunt I'd rather see it when she pulls her knickers aside, down or off first. "Porno shoes" are also a turn-off for me - sexy heels or boots, please. The whole lingerie get-up is fine when done well, but give me a chick in a little strappy top, denim mini and a pair of Converse All-Stars any day. I want to wank over the cute girl next door, not the shiny tart from down the road.
Non-erotic insertions. While some people can be put off by the cucumber or banana being slipped up the pink, I don't mind so long as the girl is enjoying it. But shit like speculums? No thanks. I want to see a girl's pussy in a erotic context - if I really want to get a close up of her cervix I'd consult a medical manual.
Hair. On the head, long. I know it sounds harsh, but I have never had a thing for shorthairs. Between the legs - let's just have some hair please. A neat triangle, landing strip, whatever - let's see some pubes. I like women that look like women down there, and the bald look is just a little ick. I don't need to mention armpit or leg hair as I think that's pretty much a given.
Abuse. Pron for me is all about adults having fun so other adults can get off on it. Any photosets where it looks like the involved parties might be any kind of duress is an immediate boner-killer.
Alvin Lucifer
03-06-2010, 04:14 AM
As the great Indiana Jones once said:
"Snakes...why did it have to be snakes!"
Some photographers think posing a woman with a python is going to sensual and phallic and mysterious. However, some of us guys suffer ophidiophobia, fear of snakes. I'm terrified of them, always have been. I won't look at a chick posing with a snake, it's nasty!
Come to think of it, I don't like pics with any animals in them. Tropical fish are okay, as long as they're in the tank.
I don´t like
- the 80´s and the 90´s (sorry, guys:)
- extremelly big/small tits
- small cocks
- shaved pussies
- piss and stuff like that
- toys
- ugly people :)
- photoshop
- fake cum
- bukkake
- hard SM
whipthedog
03-06-2010, 09:54 PM
for me it is that finger in the mouth and a dumb sexy look at the camera that is popular on softcore teen sites vids.
Also anything in a Japanese porn clip that is not shot with one continuous take. You just know that the piss that cute girl is about to drink out of a glass is iced tea
Sharkhunter
03-06-2010, 09:54 PM
On the issue of ugly tattoos, jut today I found a striking example of how body art - graffiti, I'd call it - can destroy the allure of a good-looking woman.
Perusing through R0n Harr1s' site, I stubled across Taylor Tilden - previously unknown to me. Looking at the cover shot, I was immediately smitten, as was Mr. Willy who was starting to punch a hole through my boxers. And looking at the first few pics, this is what I saw.
http://thumbnails10.imagebam.com/7091/7707da70903652.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/7707da70903652)
Well hell's bells. Stunning body, pretty face... Who wouldn't, eh?
I then went through her photsets and found a series of stinking ink horrors...
- A green shamrock and heart sitting on her pelvic bone.
- What looks like something last seen on Blackbeard positioned on the top of her foot.
- A "girly" Jolly Roger (pirate theme, again) on the back of one ankle
- A cupcake - yes, a cupcake - on the other ankle
- last but not least, what looks like a yellow bid and big fuck-off bunch of strawberries on her BACK.
http://thumbnails13.imagebam.com/7091/21192170903656.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/21192170903656) http://thumbnails24.imagebam.com/7091/128f3170903660.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/128f3170903660) http://thumbnails28.imagebam.com/7091/8a32ea70903663.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/8a32ea70903663) http://thumbnails9.imagebam.com/7091/f8a88270903665.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/f8a88270903665) http://thumbnails21.imagebam.com/7091/ff60f570903666.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/ff60f570903666) http://thumbnails16.imagebam.com/7091/4f1f7770903669.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/4f1f7770903669)
Needless to say I was hitting BACK, and Mr Willy had gone rather limp.
What a gorgeous creature, and what a massive shame. :(
Domestique
03-07-2010, 09:26 AM
A naked womans body is a turn off for me. As soon as a woman loses her last piece of clothing, I lose interest.
I just love to see stockings, high heels that look as though they have been used, suspenders and bra's on a womans body.
dbailey
03-07-2010, 10:20 AM
Tattoos
intimate piercings, nipple, labia, clitoris etc
Agressive facial expressions
Waaay tooo much pubic hair
Platform shoes
Leather and rubber
The standing squat posture.
Poor Playboy modeld who are so underpaid that they cant afford some nice 5 denier tan or nude stockings, heck I would put in the hat for them if they would just ask.
edit to add
Skanky feet, hard or fissured skin around the heel and foot edges. Some of us like feet, come on girls, visist the podiatrist before a shoot
jk666
03-07-2010, 11:51 AM
How about heels that obviously don't fit....
j6251
03-07-2010, 12:23 PM
For me it'd be:
Angry looking faces (especially the women!)
Bad hair, scruffy looking with poor roots along with poor makeup. Most US 80's and 90's films have this in, terrible, no need for scruffyness!
The camera cuts to the man just prior to ejaculation. Why the hell do we have to see that? You'll be enjoying the scene, getting into it, then suddenly you'll get a 40 second shot of his grimace. Why?
A sexy scene that the camera then pans to film something irrelevant, like an elbow or a tree, I just don't get it.
Over sized fake breasts + small fake ones that look too round in appearance and obviously fake, just doesn't do it for me.
For some reason, I don't like the colourful dildo's either lol :D
A girl taking a facial with an expression of looking like she just isn't into it, as though she doesn't care about the eroticness of the scene.
Girls who're obviously looking for "direction" from the director. Doesn't look professional, seems awkward to me and uncomfortable.
Grannies, true grannies, a BIG no!
Bukkake with beautiful girls who could be used in a more erotic scene.
Cum eating, why? I just don't get the appeal of viewing it to be turned on.
Obvious faking within a scene. Too much over the top wriggling and moaning. I'd rather see actual enjoyment than a fake performance.
Bondage.
Ugly women, and I mean, uuuuugly women!
Fat blokes. There's no greater torment than to see an out of shape fatty hump some beauty!
Tatoos. They look cheap and make the girl look cheap in a none erotic way. I want class not street trash!
Piercings don't do it either, especially on the tongue!
Red vaginas. They just look like they've been beaten up with a stick or something, horrible and blood red, urrrrgh!!! No thanks, fresh pink ones for me please.
Toe sucking. Imagine all that foot cheese, blerrgh!
Smoking too, as a none smoker I can't imagine it'd add to the moment if you tasted all the smoke, no thanks. Plus it looks too casual from the girls point of view, as though she's not into the sexyness of it all.
Shot of blokes with hairy arses who're pumping some beauty. No, just no! Why do we need to see all that evil ugly butt fluff? Yurrg!
And oddly enough (or maybe not so oddly), dead pornstars (female of course). For some weird reason, I just don't want to view their material in the same light as I did when they were alive. Which means there's many a great scene I can't raise to any more :(
Rthomas61
03-07-2010, 12:41 PM
Angeline Jolie's back is covered in tattos and I think it's hideous looking. And yet I never hear any criticism of it and she is routinely referred to as beautiful, stunning etc. The media's treatment of her as well as other actresses and models with tattoos/piercings gives the impression to girls that tattoos are well accepted by the guys and a sign that you're cool.
mixrcple
03-07-2010, 02:49 PM
Over done make up, etc
mellowyellow
03-07-2010, 03:07 PM
For me it'd be:
The camera cuts to the man just prior to ejaculation. Why the hell do we have to see that? You'll be enjoying the scene, getting into it, then suddenly you'll get a 40 second shot of his grimace. Why?
Especially in end 70's early 80's porn, LOL all those pale german male-models with the big moustaches, nasty!!
Toe sucking. Imagine all that foot cheese, blerrgh!
You'll be surprised how big a turn-on this is to many men. Give me female toes any time of day. Besides, so far most female toes that I was lucky enough to experience where as good as odorless...
All has to do with personal hygiene. If that is non-existent: I completely agree with you, then it can be disgusting...
Sharkhunter
03-07-2010, 05:23 PM
Angeline Jolie's back is covered in tattos and I think it's hideous looking. And yet I never hear any criticism of it and she is routinely referred to as beautiful, stunning etc. The media's treatment of her as well as other actresses and models with tattoos/piercings gives the impression to girls that tattoos are well accepted by the guys and a sign that you're cool.
I agree mate. And for what it's worth I would agree with you that Angelina's tattoos are hideous. It may also cause some other folk to scratch their heads in confusion, but I don't think she's all that anyway.
Of course, even if she had no tattoos it wouldn't change the fact that she's completely crackers.
mellowyellow
03-07-2010, 05:30 PM
Angeline Jolie's back is covered in tattos and I think it's hideous looking. And yet I never hear any criticism of it and she is routinely referred to as beautiful, stunning etc. The media's treatment of her as well as other actresses and models with tattoos/piercings gives the impression to girls that tattoos are well accepted by the guys and a sign that you're cool.
Another fine example of media-influence and another fine example of how awfull tattoos can be. And I like to take this opportunity to mention how much of a turnoff she is to me, but off course that is personal. I mean, everybody can like whatever they want but I think that her looks are highly overrated and appearance is a cartoon of a barbiedoll.
mellowyellow
03-07-2010, 08:18 PM
On the issue of ugly tattoos, jut today I found a striking example of how body art - graffiti, I'd call it - can destroy the allure of a good-looking woman.............
- A green shamrock and heart sitting on her pelvic bone.
- What looks like something last seen on Blackbeard positioned on the top of her foot.
- A "girly" Jolly Roger (pirate theme, again) on the back of one ankle
- A cupcake - yes, a cupcake - on the other ankle
- last but not least, what looks like a yellow bid and big fuck-off bunch of strawberries on her BACK.
http://thumbnails28.imagebam.com/7091/8a32ea70903663.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/8a32ea70903663)
Needless to say I was hitting BACK, and Mr Willy had gone rather limp.
What a gorgeous creature, and what a massive shame. :(
LOL Talking about mr. Willy gone limp, this story truly happened: I once had some luck to take an equally blonde woman that I met earlier that night in some bar, back to her place. Allthough I was not in the habbit (or normally wasn't so lucky!) to do one-night stands, we ended up making love and started to undress. After some mutual oral action it was time for a condom and I manoeuvred her on her knees to take her doggy-style.
Then I was confronted with a very large tattooed portrait of her angry looking (biker-)ex-boyfriend on her lower back. End of all the action, I appologized and got dressed and suffering from a sincere dislike of big tattoos ever since.
BigBucket
03-07-2010, 09:57 PM
Smoking, pircings, tatoos. Dirty shoes, ie skuffed bottomed shoes.
Men in photos no thanks. In porn movies yes but only from the waist down doing the biz, i'd be happy never seeing the mans face at all. Also focusing too much on the man face pulling, groaning and giggling... North im talking to you.
Sharkhunter
03-07-2010, 11:56 PM
LOL Talking about mr. Willy gone limp, this story truly happened: I once had some luck to take an equally blonde woman that I met earlier that night in some bar, back to her place. Allthough I was not in the habbit (or normally wasn't so lucky!) to do one-night stands, we ended up making love and started to undress. After some mutual oral action it was time for a condom and I manoeuvred her on her knees to take her doggy-style.
Then I was confronted with a very large tattooed portrait of her angry looking (biker-)ex-boyfriend on her lower back. End of all the action, I appologized and got dressed and suffering from a sincere dislike of big tattoos ever since.
Je. Sus.
It's like the time I had a drunken fumble with a girl, put my hand up her top and felt what was like a silicone ball in a sock. Magnified by a thousand. I am trying to put myself in your position now - you know, ready to slip right on in - and seeing that angry biker face.
*shudder*
billybunter
03-08-2010, 12:06 AM
Tattoos are gross.
Alvin Lucifer
03-08-2010, 04:42 AM
Female masturbation with fingers -- awesome!
Female masturbation with dildoes -- not so great.
Female masturbation with ridiculously huge dildoes -- a turn-off!
ironmaster
03-08-2010, 11:33 AM
Photo correction that takes away the skin's natural profile. The result is slick, but artificial in a plastic sort of way. I do like fake boobs, though.
A strong emphasis on shoes, especially on high heels.
Stockings and that classic deep red lipstick, though most men seem to like those. (?)
An over-emphasis on the girl's pussy.
Leg-spreading.
Hairy legs.
Animals and food.
Insertion-acrobatics.
Fake underage setting (teddy bears etc.). I do like pyjamas, though.
The dirty toilet booth setting (including most glory holes).
The combination of mascara and tears.
Plump chicks with oil.
smutwerx
03-08-2010, 12:39 PM
I'll probably be in the minority on this, but I don't like sex-in-public or pissing-in-public pictures. I happen to think anything is okay as long as it involves consenting adults, but these shoots drag unwilling participants, sometimes children, into it as witnesses. I like some of the simple nude-in-public pictures, like the ones I posted in that thread, but mere nudity doesn't cross the line for me because I live near three beaches where people go nude and it seems normal to me. But with public sex and pissing all I see is the aggression of it, taking over a place and ruining it for people who are simply trying to get on with their day. Just my two cents.
Sharkhunter
03-08-2010, 05:46 PM
I'll probably be in the minority on this, but I don't like sex-in-public or pissing-in-public pictures. I happen to think anything is okay as long as it involves consenting adults, but these shoots drag unwilling participants, sometimes children, into it as witnesses. I like some of the simple nude-in-public pictures, like the ones I posted in that thread, but mere nudity doesn't cross the line for me because I live near three beaches where people go nude and it seems normal to me. But with public sex and pissing all I see is the aggression of it, taking over a place and ruining it for people who are simply trying to get on with their day. Just my two cents.
I don't know where you get the idea that you would be in the minority here smutwerx - I'm not a fan of the (uncontrolled) NIP concept and I would imagine that quite a few people on here would not be too keen either. OK, it may be completely normal to trapse around in the nuddy on the streets of Budapest but as far as I see it it is tantamount to an invasion of other peoples' privacy. I totally agree that I should be allowed to look at naked girls, but reserve the right to not have them foisted on me in what could be an inappropriate scenario.
While I personally may not entirely mind seeing a naked girl in the street, things would take a different hue if I were with my girlfriend or worse still my parents. Then there is the matter of kids being around, which takes things to a completely different level of inappropriateness. This is even without discussing the idea of pissing in public, which is a little bit off even to a hardcore porn aficianado like myself.
mellowyellow
03-08-2010, 07:27 PM
...But with public sex and pissing all I see is the aggression of it, taking over a place and ruining it for people who are simply trying to get on with their day...
Don't worry, I'm sure that most people would feel uncomfortable, at least in those situations where you normally wouldn't have to expect this.
I remember about eight years ago (yep, another true story) I was heading home on the commuter-train and there was this couple on a patch of grass on a blanket doing a 69! Yeah, thats right! A 69 in broad daylight on a piece of land between the railroad track and the expressway! And I'm not kidding! Accessible by foot only. But to be seen by all those poor commuters.
I was facing forward so they where out of sight quite rapidly but the view was so brutal and uncommon that I wondered if that was all real. Then I saw the very embarrassed and uncomfortable look of a poor opposite (older female) passenger hiding behind a magazine and then I knew that it was true and that I actually saw it.
I've been confronted with public sex on earlier occassions but that was always at night, when going out, in bathrooms of clubs, stuff like that. But in daylight between traffic, I was really shocked.
Nudist Couple
03-09-2010, 12:17 PM
Mostly tattoos and fake boobs. Also, weird piercings. I don't mind earrings and maybe even a navel pierced. But no labia, no lip, no nose...those are just turn offs.
Also don't care for mass amounts of make-up...especially eye shadow.
I am enjoying the fact that my turn offs are soo common amongst the other posters here. Tattoos... I found a piece and it will follow at the end, that spoke so well of how I feel about tattoos. I think of half a dozen women that I lust over, in mainstream media and then think how they would look and how I would feel if they ruined themselves with a tattoo. Megan Fox drops about 60 % of interest due to her obsession. Angelina Jolie, same thing. If they only knew how I felt.....Ha Ha ! I think of it like this...if there was a beautiful landscape painting, then the artist decided to add to it later with some power lines or billboards. If a beautiful snowscape with virgin snow pack, had some added footprints, or tire tracks, it would be not worth looking at. Graffiti is rarely looked upon favorably unless it is tasteful and covering an even worse eyesore. Other turn offs, like many, smoking. Catching a glimpse of a hot chick and then seeing her pull a cigarette to her lips, just shot a hole in a beautiful balloon. Fake tits, I mean obvious fake tits as well as less obvious, don't get me started. Shaved pussy....I do miss the good bush from...let's say classic playboy, but not overly hairy. My wife has been clean shaven since I met her and the first time I pulled down her panties, I loved it and it really accentuates my attraction for her, but I would not mind if she let it grow back. But shaven has been taken to new highs and really detracts from most beautiful women. So here is the piece I talked about. Cheers
I love looking at women.
I am well travelled. I've been to every art gallery, theatre and auditorium in the world. I have seen every painting, watched every ballet, listened rapt to every opera. Well perhaps that is not quite true, but, even if I had, I know that at the end of my time, if asked where it was that I saw beauty most, I will reply, "it was with every woman that I gazed upon".
Every artistic endeavour aspires to, and inevitable falls short of that divine art that is woman; you.
And now you tell me that you will let some man and with needle and ink permanently mark your perfect skin! And everyone else chips in with "hear hear" and "how exciting", and "I'll get a tattoo too". Well not I. You desecrate consecrated ground.
I'll speak plainly, most particularly to the young. When you are so young, you can have no measure of your own beauty and worth. You wear your skin with less thought than your jeans.
More plainly still. The tattoos that I have seen that truly lend something to the wearer are far and few between.
Tracing my lips across your shoulder, breathing your scent deep as I traverse that holy landscape, pursuing, scrutinising, studying fascination bound by your beautiful skin, I do not want to hear that you will turn it over as a canvas for some second rate artist. Trouble me not with your arguments of freedom of choice and the honest origins of this primal art. Your beauty even if you do not know (ask your mother or someone who truly loves you) traces back to the beginning of time.
If you have an appointment for a tattoo today, postpone it until tomorrow. If I am wrong it will cost you a day. If I am right you will pay all your days. And if you do postpone your appointment, re-read this tomorrow too.
Do I really see all tattooists as second rate artists - definitely not.
Do I really feel I have the right to tell someone I don't know what to do or not do with their body - definitely not.
Do I believe that young people are blind to their own condition and worth? Like every caring parent of course I do.
Is my definition of beauty defined by what the media tells us? You should know me better than that. You are all beautiful.
Is this sexist? No the same applies to boys and girls. You are all precious and someone's baby.
And what of all of you with tattoos, that I have deeply offended? Well perhaps yours are those ones that really do work. In any case beauty is of course more than skin deep.
A lot of people show off on IC (me included) but a there is a lot written fuelled by bravado and need to be seen as extreme and edgy and daring. Well it troubles me that this may lend itself to encourage the young to make hasty decisions. Just consider the advice you would give your own children (whether you have them yet or not)
Hans Billian
03-16-2010, 09:34 PM
Hm, I'd say ugly fingernails. Can't stand it.
richter
03-17-2010, 01:27 AM
bad teeth...nothing worse than a hottie with an ugly smile
artorious
03-17-2010, 03:41 AM
tatooes ok, piercing is ok 2 , only if cute gothic but fake breast :/ instant turn off
jk666
03-17-2010, 12:37 PM
Tags: I mean really if you're going to pose in something see thru the least you can do it cut off the ugly tag.
Stuffed Animals: I understand they're there to give the illusion that the girl is sweet, innocent and perhaps even underage....but no thanks.
amhhd052
03-17-2010, 07:58 PM
Shaved girls, fake breasts, tattoes and other "body arts" are definitely what i don't like. All i ask, as many here: natural women.
stanleysx
03-17-2010, 08:45 PM
fake breast, fishnet, boots. heels all the way.
Rick Danger
03-18-2010, 05:30 AM
I've read all of the comments on this thread with great interest.
I do not intend this as a sermon, but I would like to make a few points of my own.
First, I feel it necessary to focus on whether the discussion concerns glamour, erotica, or pornography. Given this is the Vintage Erotica Forum, I will try to limit my points to discussing the glamour and erotica of years past with appropriate comparisons to present day. If I were discussing pornography than frankly anything goes, regardless of taste.
Pubic hair
I'm definitely old school. I prefer women with pubic hair. I don't need a forest, but I don't like the bare look. "Back in the day" the only women who shaved off their pubic hair were B-grade porno actresses. I can't wait until some of the women today who shave find out that pubic hair grows back even THICKER. What are they going to do, call Lawn Doctor ???
Piercings
OK, I give up. I can deal with navel rings, since it seems every woman from 6 to 60 today has one. But pierced nipples, labia, etc. Yuck ! No thanks.
Tattoos
Again, I can live with a small tattoo somewhere, esp. the small of the back, shoulder, wrist, ankle or buttocks. But large tats plastered across a woman's stomach, thighs, butt, neck, or breasts I find repulsive. And someone should tell women with dark complexions and the amateur photographers who photograph them that BLACK INK TATTOOS on dark skin DO NOT PHOTOGRAPH WELL. They wind up looking like scars or burns. Better lighting and attention to exposure control helps.
Look at the beautiful skin tone on this woman. To take a needle to her skin would be like taking a crayon to a Van Gogh or a Renoir. Sacrilege !
http://thumbnails12.imagebam.com/7245/bce18f72447478.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/bce18f72447478)
Breast Augmentation
I might have assumed that only models of the current era are guilty of having breast augmentation. But when I looked further, I decided that this wasn't true.
To argue my point, here are two of my favorite Playboy Playmates of all time: China Lee, Miss August 1964 and Sue Williams, Miss April 1965.
I recall a quote from famed gatefold photographer Pompeo Posar. He stated that when Ms. Lee first auditioned for Playboy, her breasts were somewhat small. When she returned her breasts were significantly larger. Here is the pictorial evidence:
http://thumbnails17.imagebam.com/7245/c44cdf72447449.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/c44cdf72447449)http://thumbnails27.imagebam.com/7245/ece20a72447451.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/ece20a72447451)
In Ms. William's case, the difference is even more pronounced. Sue was one of the smallest Playmates (4' 11", 98 lbs) ever. The difference in the following pictures is remarkable:
http://thumbnails27.imagebam.com/7245/8796d072447452.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/8796d072447452)http://thumbnails19.imagebam.com/7245/5b9ae972447454.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/5b9ae972447454)
It's hard to argue that SOME KIND of augmentation was not at work here. It's also hard to argue that the results were in my opinion very successful !
To compare China and Sue with a more contemporary model, here are before and after pictures of the beautiful Sandy Jordan.
http://thumbnails23.imagebam.com/7245/bd906372447456.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/bd906372447456)http://thumbnails25.imagebam.com/7245/1fef9472447458.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/1fef9472447458)
With apologizes to my friend BlackV8, who is an "original" Sandy fan.
I think what works here is that Ms. Jordan did not attempt to jump from an A/B cup to a DD as so many women today often do. The result is that her breasts look proportional and very beautiful.
I think it's clear that while the majority of classic models were natural, there were obvious exceptions. And if the enhancement is done in a tasteful manner, the results can be very appealing.
HOWEVER, the problem today is that with so many women opting for breast augmentation, there are clearly many that are not very appealing. Again, women jumping from rather small breast sizes to DD, DDD, or larger (!) look frankly comical. And I have seen a number of models with pronounced post operative scars, either around the areola (periareolar method) as seen below or underneath the breasts (inframammary fold method). In some cases these scars do not completely heal. I don't find surgical scars particularily attractive on a model, do you ?
http://thumbnails25.imagebam.com/7245/4fa04f72447481.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/4fa04f72447481)
I still perfer natural breasts. They move, they jiggle, they have a life of their own. My favorite images are the Playmate Video of Anna Clark nude on an Australian beach, her beautiful D cup breasts swaying as she walks ! (The first two images below are animated so that you can see EXACTLY what I mean !)
http://thumbnails22.imagebam.com/7253/f1e70d72522612.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/f1e70d72522612) http://thumbnails23.imagebam.com/7253/dd008e72522613.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/dd008e72522613)http://thumbnails26.imagebam.com/7253/7800ce72523607.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/7800ce72523607) http://thumbnails24.imagebam.com/7253/f2fc7372523608.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/f2fc7372523608) http://thumbnails24.imagebam.com/7253/e87c8772523617.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/e87c8772523617) http://thumbnails16.imagebam.com/7253/506ffa72523624.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/506ffa72523624) http://thumbnails28.imagebam.com/7253/bb71b072523626.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/bb71b072523626) http://thumbnails12.imagebam.com/7253/7d4e9272523629.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/7d4e9272523629) http://thumbnails28.imagebam.com/7253/84f9f072523631.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/84f9f072523631) http://thumbnails26.imagebam.com/7253/116e7a72523634.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/116e7a72523634)http://thumbnails24.imagebam.com/7253/2021a672523636.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/2021a672523636)http://thumbnails24.imagebam.com/7253/a97f1672523642.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/a97f1672523642)
Buttocks Augmentation
Until about a year ago, I refused to believe that women were actually having their butts augmented. Unfortunately, a recent story out of the New York metropolitan area concerned four women who were injected with silicon caulking (the kind used for sealing showers and bathtubs) by some fly-by-night unlicensed surgeon. These poor women will suffer the pains of Hell trying to regain their health.
A very popular Internet and music video model was recently "outed" when pictures of her revealed two circular scars underneath her buttocks. These scars are apparently the injection sites for her silicon injections.
http://thumbnails26.imagebam.com/7245/332cc972447460.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/332cc972447460)
Just plain stupid !
Full Figured versus Just Plain Fat !
OK, I understand that tastes in women vary. And maybe there ARE far too many glamour/erotica/porn websites. The content of some "glamour" websites is just plain - ahh, TRASH ! (The crew behind VEF deserve some kind of award both for the quality of the content as well as the intelligent organization and maintenance of this site !)
I love full figured women. I was a big Joanne Latham fan. I love Marina Baker. I also like petite and trim models. I like to consider the whole package. For me, it comes down to porportionality. As a mentor of mine in the fashion industry once told me, a model's bust and hips should be ten inches bigger than her waist; e.g., 38-28-38.
Let's consider the woman who really brought the "Full Figured Look" into vogue: Anna Nicole Smith, may God rest her soul. She was 5' 11" tall, weighed in at 140 lbs with a 36DD-26-38 figure at the time of her Playboy Playmate appearance. Marina did not disclose her weight, but she stood 5' 7" and a fabulous 34EE-23-35. Even back in the Sixties, Playboy featured women who you can hardly describe as frail. My favorites were Rosemary Hillcrest (5' 6", 145 lbs, 41-25-38), Toni Ann Thomas (5' 5", 120 lbs, 38-22-36), Melinda Windsor (5' 4", 119 lbs, 38-23-36), and the legendary Cynthia Myers (5' 3", 119 lbs, 39-24-36).
http://thumbnails27.imagebam.com/7245/dd07d172447462.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/dd07d172447462)http://thumbnails23.imagebam.com/7245/3e706a72447464.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/3e706a72447464)http://thumbnails20.imagebam.com/7245/e3c5a972447466.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/e3c5a972447466)http://thumbnails28.imagebam.com/7245/0d3a2c72447467.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/0d3a2c72447467)http://thumbnails27.imagebam.com/7245/20d33e72447469.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/20d33e72447469)http://thumbnails25.imagebam.com/7245/c3298672447472.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/c3298672447472)
But I have seen plenty of pictures on the web of women who frankly are a cheeseburger and an order of fries short of being morbidly obese, trying to look alluring in fishnet stockings and spiked heels. Cellulite and all. The first picture is OK. The second picture - ahh, come on ! Again, if this floats your boat, more power to you. But if I have to put a saddle on it to ride it, count me out !
http://thumbnails28.imagebam.com/7245/a9406072447475.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/a9406072447475)http://thumbnails17.imagebam.com/7245/49e44872447476.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/49e44872447476)
By the same token, I don't find nude pictures of rail-thin mannequins appealing either. I like curves. I love women with nice full breasts like ripe csaba melons, round hips, luscious thighs, and beautiful butts. Women without curves, or with rolls of fat and no body tone should keep their clothes on !
"I tell ya, my wife was never nice. On our first date, I asked her if I could give her a goodnight kiss on the cheek - she bent over!" - Rodney Dangerfield
Mr. Gussett
03-18-2010, 05:47 PM
Women holding themselves open, so to speak. I've always found it a huge turn-off, pictorially.... The Japanese seem to be particularly keen on this - when they're not pixelating any genitals in sight, that is......
Sharkhunter
03-18-2010, 06:04 PM
Epic post, Rick Danger. And plenty there to agree with.
WantFullBush
03-23-2010, 11:45 AM
Women holding themselves open, so to speak. I've always found it a huge turn-off, pictorially.... The Japanese seem to be particularly keen on this - when they're not pixelating any genitals in sight, that is......
I am the exact oposite. Models holding their labia spread open are a big turn on for me.
munzie
03-26-2010, 12:37 PM
Bad foundation- I hate when you can clearly see a woman's face having been plastered with a completely different colour than the rest of her flesh...
Jacova_fan
03-28-2010, 03:36 AM
1. Tattoos
2. Piercing (except earrings and nose rings on Indian models only)
3. Boob jobs
4. Wigs (especially those bad '80s ones)
5. Very long false nails (trashy)
6. Trashy/tarty clothes
7. Dildoes/toys - big turn-on for some, big turn-off for me (certain natural objects are ok sometimes though, like, er, bananas ;))
8. Smoking
9. Lesbian scenes (which I guess puts me in the minority)
Men:
Any of the above that may apply, plus long hair
Garuda, it's like you read my mind! I agree with your list! I would also add to it:
- Shaved pussies, (I can't tell you how much I miss women with pubic hair... Womankind were endowed by their Creator with a wonderful triangle for a reason.)
- women holding themselves open; I can't explain it, but that does nothing for me. Even my namesake: (Martina) Jacova (aka Kyla Cole, the most beautiful woman ever to be photographed, shrivels little willy when she does that.
Clemenza
03-28-2010, 04:46 AM
There's something about black or dark blue nail polish that just turns me off completely. Don't know why, but it just seems totally unnatural & creepy --- all I can think of is Herman Munster!
Another big turn off is that sour, annoyed facial expression worn by some women in amateur photos. It screams "I'm only doing this because my boyfriend/husband insisted."
Nudist Couple
03-28-2010, 04:27 PM
To agree with garuda37 with some embellishments:
1. Tattoos (can't stand this...but I suppose in the US the kind of woman that gets into porn is also the kind of woman that gets a tattoo)
2. Piercings (except earrings, maybe naval is okay)
3. Boob jobs (absolutely terrible, abhor this practice. I like natural, doesn't matter if they're big or small as long as they're natural)
4. Wigs (always bad)
5. Very long false nails (trashy, really hate that. This isn't "The Jersey Shore")
6. Trashy/tarty clothes (really, just dress like a normal person)
7. Dildoes/toys (never got into dildos. I enjoy a woman masturbating, but doing it like 99% of all women, with just their fingers)
8. Heavy make-up and fake eyelashes. (seriously, cut this out).
9. Lesbian scenes (never been a fan of lesbian scenes either...but the few I do like are smoking hot. It's just most are just "meh")
10. Shaving everything. I don't mind trimming, but come on, have a little hair at least.
Men:
Any of the above that may apply, especially long hair (seriously, cut the long hair. I'm looking at you Evan Stone and Mr. 80's Mullet-Man Tom Byron)
tony_grego
03-29-2010, 05:15 PM
I also hate genital piercings and large tatoos, but above all, eschatological scenes, including pissing. I don't see the sensual thing in a woman eliminating their food waste.:confused:
ironmaster
03-29-2010, 08:31 PM
I don't see the sensual thing in a woman eliminating their food waste.:confused:
Answering your question marks:
As I see it, it's just a question how far your love goes. If you love her inner beauty, you will love the things that were hugged by it as well.
tony_grego
03-30-2010, 06:44 AM
it's just a question how far your love goes. If you love her inner beauty, you will love the things that were hugged by it as well.[/QUOTE]
I agree, but i can love my grandma and she don't turm me on.;)
Toxic Dog
03-30-2010, 01:03 PM
(1) Male performers.
In porn, they should be nothing more than life support systems for erect cocks.
I don't want to see their hairy arses, their "manly chests", their bad moustaches or their grimacing faces.
Unless absolutely necessary, the men should be seen from the abdomen downwards only.
(2) Penetration close-ups.
Seen one - you've seen 'em all. Yes, I want to see sexy women getting fucked. But at the same time I want to see as much of the woman as possible (legs, tits, face, body, sexy undies).
Nudist Couple
03-30-2010, 03:00 PM
(1) Male performers.
In porn, they should be nothing more than life support systems for erect cocks.
I don't want to see their hairy arses, their "manly chests", their bad moustaches or their grimacing faces.
Unless absolutely necessary, the men should be seen from the abdomen downwards only.
This attitude is one of the main reasons of the downfall of porn. It used to be two people engaging in sex....but men, for whatever reason, don't like seeing other nude males have reduced most porn produced today to just gonzo type things.
Seeing a naked man doesn't make you gay, that's the only thing I can figure out as to why this attitude is so prevalent. It's okay. It's two people having sex...not a woman having sex with a faceless man. But why stop there? Why not only view lesbian porn or solo-female porn. I mean, you're seeing a real cock there! YOU'LL CATCH TEH GHEY!
I'd like them to bring back kissing too. No one kisses anymore. Maybe we can have some CGI experts to just go in to all the movies and digitally erase all the men except for their disembodied cocks floating in the air. I mean, if you're going to go unrealistic, go 100% unrealistic. :rolleyes:
Toxic Dog
03-30-2010, 04:36 PM
This attitude is one of the main reasons of the downfall of porn. It used to be two people engaging in sex....but men, for whatever reason, don't like seeing other nude males have reduced most porn produced today to just gonzo type things.
Actually I'm not too keen on the "gonzo" genre either.
Seeing a naked man doesn't make you gay, that's the only thing I can figure out as to why this attitude is so prevalent. It's okay. It's two people having sex...not a woman having sex with a faceless man. But why stop there? Why not only view lesbian porn or solo-female porn. I mean, you're seeing a real cock there! YOU'LL CATCH TEH GHEY!
What a strange thing to say.
I'd like them to bring back kissing too. No one kisses anymore. Maybe we can have some CGI experts to just go in to all the movies and digitally erase all the men except for their disembodied cocks floating in the air. I mean, if you're going to go unrealistic, go 100% unrealistic. :rolleyes:
Now you're just being silly, and (if I may say so) a little bit aggressive & defensive.
Why?
The thread is about "turn offs in porn", which I took to mean an invitation for folks to post up their own comments as to what THEY (personally) don't like, and (surprise surprise) likes and dislikes vary.
Your handle tells me that you're either a couple sharing an account here or (probably more likely) one half of a couple who enjoys "couples" porn - which is fine (and some studios cater to that). Each to their own.
All I'm saying is that when I kick back to relax with a bit of porn, I (that's me, personally) don't want to see extended facial close-ups of a Burt Reynolds lookalike or some German bloke with a bad haircut.
Nor do I want to see some hairy male arse filling my screen as it rises and falls for 2, 3, 4 or 5 minutes without interruption. Believe it or not, us heterosexual males who mainly fly solo with our porn viewing are strange like that - we find looking at the female performers far more fulfilling and enjoyable.
But it's got nothing to do with being "frightened of turning gay" - what a daft thing to say.
I make no apologies for my own personal porn preferences (as stated a few posts up). I'm just saying what for me makes an enjoyable porn experience. And I'm not trying to force them onto you either. So why take the attitude that you're somehow "superior" and your own tastes "higher brow"?
So get down off your high horse - I like porn. You like porn. The difference is just one of nuances. The bottom line is that the mediawatch brigade would think that you're just as depraved as I am, LOL.
Nudist Couple
03-30-2010, 05:48 PM
Actually I'm not too keen on the "gonzo" genre either.
And yet, that's exactly what you're describing. Because in story-based porn (where the actors are playing parts, where their sex is in context...otherwise it's Gonzo which consists of "okay, here's Kimberly and she's going to be fucked by 3 black guys....ACTION") you see the guys. This is "Vintage Erotica" by it's very nature. The features...even the short loops...all had some story behind them. If you're looking for just shots of the women with the guy from the waist down, look no further than Gonzo. It's what you're describing.
Your handle tells me that you're either a couple sharing an account here or (probably more likely) one half of a couple who enjoys "couples" porn - which is fine (and some studios cater to that). Each to their own.
Yes, I'm the female half of a couple...and quite honestly, I abhor "couples" porn. I prefer a story, yes, but I want it followed up by very graphic, very explicit sex.
All I'm saying is that when I kick back to relax with a bit of porn, I (that's me, personally) don't want to see extended facial close-ups of a Burt Reynolds lookalike or some German bloke with a bad haircut.
Nor do I want to see some hairy male arse filling my screen as it rises and falls for 2, 3, 4 or 5 minutes without interruption. Believe it or not, us heterosexual males who mainly fly solo with our porn viewing are strange like that - we find looking at the female performers far more fulfilling and enjoyable.
But, that's the whole idea from watching porn, yes? Seeing two people have sex. Not just a body part having sex with a woman. It's like saying "I really like Apple Pie but I don't like it with apple's in it, if they just got rid of the apples, it would be great apple pie". But okay, you don't like seeing other males naked. That's fine. Then why not just confine yourself to lesbian or solo-only porn, yes? True, this is about likes and dislikes and you've expressed your dislike of seeing naked men...but why even subject yourself to it when there's an obvious solution? Like I don't like the porn star Jerry Butler, and will go out of my way to never ever rent or watch any movies with him in them. There, problem solved. I suppose that if every porno that came out had him in them, then I could complain...and very loudly. But with gonzo or lesbian only porn, you get exactly what you're wanting more of, yes? And unfortunately, gonzo is like 90% of the market now, so there's never a shortage. :D
But it's got nothing to do with being "frightened of turning gay" - what a daft thing to say.
I apologize, didn't mean to imply that you were frightened of that. It's just that you're not the first person to say this. I've seen it quite a few times in the past and it seemed to coincide with the rise of gonzo porn which focuses mainly on the guy from the waist down and their cocks only.
Toxic Dog
03-30-2010, 06:42 PM
If you're looking for just shots of the women with the guy from the waist down, look no further than Gonzo. It's what you're describing.
No - it isn't. There's plenty of vintage porn that caters to my tastes as well. And plenty of gonzo that features lengthy shots of contorted male faces, hairy male backsides and tedious genital zoom-ins.
You can't just say "gonzo is this and vintage is that", that's a gross over-simpification.
What I don't like about a lot of the gonzo material that's out there is things like all the spitting, the "circus acts" and (in some cases like the material that Rocco Siffreddi puts out) the borderline violence that you get.
Yes, I'm the female half of a couple...and quite honestly, I abhor "couples" porn. I prefer a story, yes, but I want it followed up by very graphic, very explicit sex.
That's fair enough and that's your taste. But personally (and this is just me), if I want a movie with a storyline I'll watch 'Lord Of The Rings' or 'The Godfather' - something like that. When it comes to porn, my interests are just in the females. I don't get the chance to watch porn much anyway - just a snatched 10 or 20 minutes now and again. So I don't have time for plots!
But, that's the whole idea from watching porn, yes? Seeing two people have sex. Not just a body part having sex with a woman. It's like saying "I really like Apple Pie but I don't like it with apple's in it, if they just got rid of the apples, it would be great apple pie". But okay, you don't like seeing other males naked. That's fine. Then why not just confine yourself to lesbian or solo-only porn, yes? True, this is about likes and dislikes and you've expressed your dislike of seeing naked men...but why even subject yourself to it when there's an obvious solution?
You seem to have missed my original point completely and, judging from all this banging on about disembodied penises and a "dislike of seeing naked men", you've taken my original "life support system for penises" comment far too literally.
Perhaps if I phrase it differently it will be clearer: I regard men in porn as "essential props", without which porn would not (after all) be porn. I am in fact totally ambivalent (if that's the right word) towards naked men in porn: They don't turn me on, but I don't recoil in horror and disgust either when one hoves into view. They're just kind of "there", but at the same time doing an essential job (so to speak).
What I DON'T like however is when the camera focuses on them for any length of time (for contexts, see posts above).
To (hopefully) make it a bit clearer as to what I mean, try and picture it if you can from a male POV: You're laying back and enjoying a breathtaking full-frontal view of (just for example) Amber Lynn, Marilyn Jess, Nina Hartley or some other fine example of feminine pulchritude in all their sexy glory riding a stiff todger. Then all of a sudden, the film cuts to the leering, sweaty face of someone like Mike Horner (or indeed Jerry Butler), and remains there for the next 90 seconds.
It's enough to put a fella off his stroke, it really is. And THAT is what I find a turn off. NOT the simple presence of men in porn.
Hope that's cleared it up.
trexxx
03-30-2010, 07:05 PM
Tatoo's, body piercings and shaved areas that look raw from razor burn really suck. If I spot any of these in a thumb then I forget it.
martin222
03-30-2010, 08:26 PM
i dont like those transsexuals who look like women except for 1 thing too much...
and i dont like pornstars who dont have balls... there is 1 who only has 1 ball left
and some male pornstars even dont have any balls....
i hate that...
Mr.Bungle
03-31-2010, 08:23 AM
- The model spreading herself wide enough for two lanes of traffic. :mad:
- The guy putting a choke-hold on his junk, in a vain (or vein) attempt to pump things up. :rolleyes:
- The constant wearing of high heels (and nothing else), even when posing on a bed. :confused:
stanleysx
03-31-2010, 09:21 AM
Fishnet stockings and boots.
classic fan
04-06-2010, 09:39 PM
Women who bite their nails,tattoos,shaved pussies and big fanny lips ergh lol
Futuro
04-07-2010, 02:32 PM
I just absolutely hate all porn shot in kitchen or garage, dark shed is bad too, but quite rare. Kitchen table action could be a "classic" for many but I think It`s very boring. Garage is even worse, it just tells that kitchen is so dirty and full of unwashed greasy dishes that you just can`t shoot your tattooed-gagging-spitting-nihilist-nonbudget-badly lighted-misogynist-gonzo-crap with annoying music and stench of pirate-steroids anywhere else, in case if you are making a video, but all this goes with photo-shoot too. Don`t like office-stuff either, you just spot old computers and copymachines from pictures instead of looking a gorgeous lady so your thoughts start to drift and you lost your feeling. :D
http://img179.imagevenue.com/loc227/th_49676_dirty_kitchen_123_227lo.jpg (http://img179.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=49676_dirty_kitchen_123_227lo.jpg)ht tp://img224.imagevenue.com/loc910/th_49677_trs80_i_123_910lo.jpg (http://img224.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=49677_trs80_i_123_910lo.jpg)http://img194.imagevenue.com/loc11/th_49679_100_2994_123_11lo.jpg (http://img194.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=49679_100_2994_123_11lo.jpg)
Bernard321
05-01-2010, 03:05 PM
Anal of any kind!
blatt
05-01-2010, 04:35 PM
Staged or violent pictures where the girl has smeared make up and bad eyeliner that has been made to run .Staged as she pulls a pained face and looks to camera like shes been being badly abused .Even worse when she has actually been abused. Not sure how best to describe it ?. They look like rape pictures if you know what im describing.Hate those.Bad enough so many of these girls are no doubt doing something that realistically they never grew up dreaming of. Dont need to see sick photos where it looks like the girl has been tortured and abused etc. Leaves me cold.If it was up to me id have photos that at least showed some signs of respect for the girls.80s style of porn was the best i think.Beautiful women in beautiful shots.Looked it up to double check name.Its gonzo type porn pics i hate etc.Hate that sort of stuff.Think its photos and vids like that which help encourage low opinions and some morons to commit violence against women:(
tony_grego
05-01-2010, 06:19 PM
What about this one?
http://thumbnails26.imagebam.com/7874/4f08a678732084.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/4f08a678732084)
Salut !
burpman
05-10-2010, 01:19 AM
What the f*ck happened to natural looking women? Every woman under 35 thinks this is the way to attract a man?! It seems only women in their mid 30's and up still look natural to some degree. I think a lot of younger women have been sold on the gobshite notion of body modification rather than being happy with what you were born with. You don't need the adornments, you yourself are more than enough.
Clemenza
05-10-2010, 02:05 AM
Fisting. I have never understood the appeal of this. It's not even interesting, much less erotic.
sloco39
05-12-2010, 03:13 PM
For me, one big turn off is fishnet stockings. I don't think they make a woman look erotic.
dbailey
05-12-2010, 03:45 PM
For me, one big turn off is fishnet stockings. I don't think they make a woman look erotic.
Yes, I agree, although our view may not court popularity on this forum.
I would rate fishnets actually below bare legs for erotic appeal and yet I adore flesh toned stockings, RHT, shiny hose, and even woolly socks in bedroom scenes, but....not fishnets
Oh and although not a turn off...what makes me cry out in frustration is when a pretty model has gone to the trouble of wearing a suspender belt and then not actually put the stockings on...what a waste
bushw1ck
05-13-2010, 04:49 AM
1) Sexual assault fantasies regardless of model consent.
2) Fisting, bathroom activities and vomiting.
3) Gender bender surprises.
4) Fake tits.
5) Unnecessary flesh concealing clothing.
6) Tony Montana.
7) Guys wearing wristwatches.
8) Bondage fetish wear -- My interest in B&D is confined to whatever my girlfriend can think of to do with the belt from her bathrobe if I've been naughty & deserve it.
9) Cold or uncomfortable looking settings (unless used in a Gothic Horror theme).
10) Military themes, settings and costuming.
11) "Artist in their studio" or "artist with their models" fantasies with simulated contemporary artwork.
12) John Holmes after June 1981.
ixler8
05-15-2010, 04:00 AM
Tattoos, Piercings and Toilet stuff are things that I dont like to see
The Majot
05-15-2010, 09:29 AM
POV. Maybe I am a voyeur, but I have never understood the attraction of POV films.
I also agree with many of the respondents about the turn-off of tattoos, piercings and "body sculpture". I have several friends who, like me, are into their 50s and regret their wives or partners making that decision to have "Betty Boop" tattooed on their nether regions. They are more like "Betty Droop" now that nature has begun its downward spiral!
I would also need coaxing to find a scene where the model was obviously high on some form of modern chemistry in any way erotic. :(
Centollaman
05-15-2010, 09:01 PM
Excess of plastic surgery in the face, specially in mouth... and fake butts.
Hellecaster
05-23-2010, 11:47 AM
My turnoffs in porn.
1.Female actors wearing beachwear, headbands, shirt and tie and clothing in sharp colors or schoolgirl outfits. Striped and checked clothing is also terrible for me.
2.Fake tits, take teeth’s, fluffy hair and hard pumped bodies.
3.Shaved pussies.
4.Softphotofilters that makes the pictures dim or red-ish.
5.The pornstar look.
6.Male pornstar that looks like Mr. Universe (in fuck scenes with females).
7.When the show close-ups of male faces.
8.When the pussy lips look dry even though it’s about to swallow a big dick.
9.To sharp studio light. It makes scenes look unrealistic and plastic.
10.When the girl in the beginning of a scene is using for example a sexy leather jacket or a pvc coat and then takes it off.
11.Cock sucking scenes that never ends.
12.To see male porn starts jerking themselves off.
13.Faked screaming and mimics that looks like they are about to die of pain during sex.
14.Makeup.
15.Females looking like “Ladies”.
porty
05-23-2010, 11:42 PM
Fakeness in any way.
Shaved pussies.
Tattoos.
Anal in any form. Leave that for gay love.
Close ups with male porn stars butthole in shot.
Dick slapping. Taking it out and slapping the pussy with it. WTF is that about?
Screamers. Females who sound like you're killing them not drilling them.
Screwed up pussies that don't really want the dick.
Scenes that jump the initial insertion scene. Usually because of the above.
torwell
05-28-2010, 11:38 AM
I hate the kind of editing that gives you five minutes of screen-filling close-up genitals, then two seconds of the girl's face and then five more minutes of giant genitalia.
And for some reason in a lot of 80's movies, just as the girl is about to start fellating the guy, they cut away to a close-up reaction shot of the guy's face. Who did they think was watching these things, anyway?
mrbation
05-29-2010, 02:21 AM
Long leather boots
mellowyellow
05-29-2010, 04:37 PM
And for some reason in a lot of 80's movies, just as the girl is about to start fellating the guy, they cut away to a close-up reaction shot of the guy's face. Who did they think was watching these things, anyway?
I don't know if it's true but I once understood that in the 80ies sometimes 'Stand-in' cocks were used. So they could film either the actor's face or "his" dick, either one preferrably in close-up.
palo5
05-29-2010, 09:44 PM
Fakeness in any way.
Dick slapping. Taking it out and slapping the pussy with it. WTF is that about?
The half-wits think we get off watching them wag their dicks :rolleyes:
My turnoffs in porn.
3.Shaved pussies.
Fair enough,but you want a pussy to look feminine, and not like anything that could be mistaken for a part of Ron Jeremy's hideous anatomy :eek:
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.