Will Jennifer Aniston get naked on film?

[cartman]

Read in the newspaper today that she is to go topless in her next film.
It's called Wanderlust in which she plays a housewife who goes to live in a hippie community.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1306437/Jennifer-Aniston-topless-new-film.html

[purplecloud]

I wonder if her decesion to go topless in a movie has anything to do with the disapponting box office of her recent films. Then again, who cares what the reason is if she's going topless in a movie.

[cylnzz]

Read in the newspaper today that she is to go topless in her next film.
It's called Wanderlust in which she plays a housewife who goes to live in a hippie community.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1306437/Jennifer-Aniston-topless-new-film.html

A bit too late. Every couple of years i hear a story about how she's gonna finally do a real not bullshit nude scene. (Goodgirl, breakup, derailed, etc) every time I plunk down the $$ to see one of her even insulting to ERA lesbians movies, I'm the one that get's screwed, not her.

When the pseudo/Alba style, camera shadow, cgi blurred, 1/5th of a second, scene of her naked left ankle goes by, i'll maybe save it. Maybe.

[lyubov]

A bit too late. Every couple of years i hear a story about how she's gonna finally do a real not bullshit nude scene. (Goodgirl, breakup, derailed, etc) every time I plunk down the $$ to see one of her even insulting to ERA lesbians movies, I'm the one that get's screwed, not her.

When the pseudo/Alba style, camera shadow, cgi blurred, 1/5th of a second, scene of her naked left ankle goes by, i'll maybe save it. Maybe.
I totally agree with you. Topless can only mean showing what we want to see - her big nipples - no cover-ups and all the rest ...... I wonder, though, whether this will turn out to be the usual disappointment?!

[USBPepsi]

I totally agree with you. Topless can only mean showing what we want to see - her big nipples - no cover-ups and all the rest ...... I wonder, though, whether this will turn out to be the usual disappointment?!

I would bet fairly serious money that the answer to that is yes.

[pharoahegypt]

we usually are.... so lets hope for once we're not...!!??? i would so love to see her boobies in all their unfettered glory.. no matter what we all think of her abilities as an actress...!!!

[sicko]

can i ask there is a video of her topless walking up the beach to the frends theme is that real ive seen it it looks like her to me

[pharoahegypt]

its just a looky-like im afraid... but we can dream....lol.

[Dirk]

A bit too late. Every couple of years i hear a story about how she's gonna finally do a real not bullshit nude scene. (Goodgirl, breakup, derailed, etc) every time I plunk down the $$ to see one of her even insulting to ERA lesbians movies, I'm the one that get's screwed, not her.

When the pseudo/Alba style, camera shadow, cgi blurred, 1/5th of a second, scene of her naked left ankle goes by, i'll maybe save it. Maybe.

Her nipples are visible in "The good girl"!

[DTravel]

Her nipples are visible in "The good girl"!

If you freeze-frame at just the right place and turn the brightness of your monitor up high enough to be a navigational beacon for the ISS, yes, her nipples are visible. :D

[blakes_blakey]

any news on whether she has shot topless scenes in
wonder lust yet ?

[USBPepsi]

Whole Video:
http://filekeen.com/vcsvwut9gj01/Just.Go.With.It.2011.TS.XViD-IMAGiNE.avi.html

And remember, folks, she's promising her first real topless scene later this year, so keep your fingers crossed and hope she isn't fibbing this time!

[madjack]

It'll probably be the same as the break up.She films the scene then the director cuts it all out.

[cylnzz]

It'll probably be the same as the break up. She films the scene, she and her agent get the publicity they want, then the director cuts it all out.

fixed it for ya. :D

[ImTheMan]

according to Nudography, Aniston is topless in the upcoming film Wanderlust

I'll believe that when i see it. i remember so many other films where it was reported she would be topless, and then in the end it turned out she either wasn't, or she was but you can't see anything. which in my book is defined as not topless.

[pharoahegypt]

according to Nudography, Aniston is topless in the upcoming film Wanderlust

I'll believe that when i see it. i remember so many other films where it was reported she would be topless, and then in the end it turned out she either wasn't, or she was but you can't see anything. which in my book is defined as not topless.

all this was discussed a couple of pages back. we all agreed to wait and see, as we are all as sceptical as yourself over this. halle berry finally got around to it, and hasnt put them away since.... so we can all live in hope i guess.. until proven correct when jennifer doesnt get em out at least.....

[Wookiee01]

all this was discussed a couple of pages back. we all agreed to wait and see, as we are all as sceptical as yourself over this. halle berry finally got around to it, and hasnt put them away since.... so we can all live in hope i guess.. until proven correct when jennifer doesnt get em out at least.....

Maybe this wil help out in the "Will Jennifer Aniston get naked on film" discussion. It's from the IMDB forum for a screening of the film "Wounderlust" in Burbank.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1655460/board/flat/180124278?p=1

I also found this little tidbit.

While the Judd Apatow (http://blog.mrskin.com/director/Judd_Apatow/3759/)-produced Wanderlust (http://www.mrskin.com/wanderlust-girls-t48260.html) is not scheduled for release until October, one of Mr. Skin's most esteemed Skin Skouts caught an early screening this week and reports that the rumors are true: the movie does prominently feature Jennifer Aniston nude. (http://www.mrskin.com/jennifer-aniston-nude-c180.html)

Here's the scoop(s):

"So to he who appreciates all things nude, we saw a preview of a really funny new Apatow movie last night called Wanderlust. It stars Paul Rudd and Aniston who find themselves on a nudist colony of sorts. And, in a protest scene, Aniston bares boobs with two long (enough) lingering shots on her perkiness. If she's had a job, it's the best in the biz. First Jen boobage that I'm aware of...and worth the wait."

[DTravel]

Still plenty of time for the shot(s) to be edited out, a la The Breakup. ;)

[cylnzz]

From her crap boxoffice numbers recently, I'm gonna switch my opinion. I think she's gonna go topless, theres gonna be a HUGE upsurge over her non-sexual gratuitous nudity, she'll enjoy that big boost for another year or so, then she'll do occasional nudes for the next few years like Berry as stated above, and 10 years from now we'll look back on her and, just like Farrah, realize it was just a haircut and some decent nipples after all.

[pharoahegypt]

but in fact she isnt a talented actress (lots better get posted here every day), her ass is a long long long ways below women like N Kidman, J Alba, J Biel, Madeleine Stowe, (hell Nicollette Sheridan's ass at 50+ is better by far), and finally, her nipples arent gonna be bigger or better than say, Farrah, or Maria Conchita Alonso, or even no tit-great-nips Felicity Huffman.

on the above, if we can go by the supposed full screen shots from the film where she flashes vince vaughn, you know the ones that show her nips in all their glory, then i reckon they will be worth seeing..:).....though no where near the size of maria or farah's..... they both have/had homungously long nips..!! :eek:

as for the rather harsher remarks uv made, a little much imho, but urs are of course valid to u and some others im sure...lol.;)

she is guilty of not being able to differenciate between on screen acting love, and the real thing though, as she always seems to end up shagging the guy from her last movie more often than not....lol. :D

lucky them though, and i wish i knew a good hollywood casting director myself...lol. (id also be up for any casting involving hale berry too);):thumbsup:

[cylnzz]

New movie from Jen, and of course it has the (by now obligatory) "she MIGHT be nude" blurb.

from some online celeb gossip blog:
"It may be good news for anybody who's just been dying to see Jennifer Aniston's breasts all these years. US Weekly has a source telling them Aniston shot several versions of a nude scene for the movie "Horrible Bosses" and that the final cut may include her boobies. That is sure to have the lines 'round the block.

This source also says, "She knows she can't show off her boobs forever, so she's going out with a bang!" Going out with a bang? What is she, dying? Or is 43 the magic age when your boobs drop to your belly button?

Of course, a second source tells the magazine that while Aniston "may appear nude, ... you do not see Jennifer topless." Well, fiddlesticks! All we have ever wanted is a little boobage from her, right? That's the reason her movies tank. No ta-tas."

and from a rather more credible source....

"After years of posing naked — but playfully concealing her breasts — Jennifer Aniston, 42, may finally flash her assets in the raunchy comedy "Horrible Bosses."

http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/43004768/ns/today-entertainment/t/naked-truth-aniston-may-go-topless-horrible-bosses/

Hmm, after the utter bombs she's had last few years, maybe she can turn into the new Sharon Stone with a whole lot of gratuitous nudity, and stay in the limelight for a while longer.

We'll see. I can guarantee you opening night will be sparse till actual humans go see if the tease is still on or if she'll finally put out.

On a side note, I watched the trailer and even if she does her normal tease the movie might have some funny "Officespace" tendencies.

Time will tell....

[cylnzz]

......

A tiny bit of further reading, blows the hype back to smoke and mirrors just like always.

from CNN:

"No nudity for Jennifer Aniston in ‘Horrible Bosses’

Everyone from Robert Pattinson to Alexander Skarsgard has been championing the reveal of their bare buns on-screen, but Jennifer Aniston is one actress who will be keeping her clothes on.

Rumors of Aniston starring in a sexy, partially-nude scene for her upcoming comedy “Horrible Bosses” surfaced last week but her rep shot down those reports in a statement to People: “The part is provocative and sexual, but also hysterically funny,” the rep said. "There are no plans for her to go fully nude or topless, but the role does require an aggressive sexuality that many folks have not seen from Jennifer on screen before."

If you recall, this certainly wouldn’t be Aniston’s first time baring all – the 41-year-old actress showed off her backside in “The Break-Up.”

Colin Farrell will play opposite Aniston in the scene, although word hasn’t spread whether or not he’ll be in the buff."

http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2010/06/17/no-nudity-for-jennifer-aniston-in-%E2%80%98horrible-bosses%E2%80%99/

so.. that saves me another $12 and time spent wondering

[cylnzz]

Are we taking bets on "Wanderlust" yet?

[DTravel]

Are we taking bets on "Wanderlust" yet?

5 Quatloos.

[cylnzz]

I bet 5 monkeybucks it's "Breakup" quality hidey tease crap under 3 seconds for the skinnydip scene, and primetime network-tv grade on the les scene. As a caveat, I bet she STILL wins/is nominated for nude scene of the year.

[kennyjackson]

5 Quatloos.

You get a thumbs up just for the ST reference

[pharoahegypt]

2 Groats.......... and not a penny more....!!! that it will be all it's been hyped to be....!!

[imtrying]

I think the nudity will be in the released film. After all, she was just voted the hottest woman ever, was she not? If that title doesn't give her the confidence to take the puppies for a walk, nothing will. Besides, with that title she owes us a gander or two. My one complaint (and it's a minor one at that) is she's yet another in a long line of actresses who wait until they're in their forties before they flash the goods. Seeing them in their ripe second-season-of-Friends prime would have been a lot more satisfying.

[cylnzz]

Uh oh. My scepticism is being tested. Was chatting with some folks on another board who claim theyve seen the show as audience testers or whatever they call them for marketing research, and the questionairres they were asked to fill out had tons of questions about Aniston's nudity and amount of it. Naturally, these were both 40 year old males who frequent celeb and movie boards so they both voted for as much, as often, is there anymore? Time will tell... So. It looks to me like there's the POSSIBILITY, but the final edits arent in, and theyre still tweaking for maximum impact. Will we finally get treated to some Aniston goodies? Yeah, we'll see in a month.

[nbryce37]

I read that Jen's topless scene in Wanderlust might be CGI? I sure hope not! Does anyone have any insight on this?

[pharoahegypt]

I read that Jen's topless scene in Wanderlust might be CGI? I sure hope not! Does anyone have any insight on this?

did you actually read the last three pages; before you posted that....????:confused:

no; guess not..!!! :mad::eek:

[cylnzz]

Ok. Not unexpected but still a total let down. http://upcomingnudescenes.net/index.php/2012/02/16/no-nudity-from-jennifer-aniston-in-the-f http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1655460/ http://forum.celebtop.com/viewtopic.php?f=166&t=15916&start=1596 Well, there you have it ever hopeful horndogs, Ms. Aniston has fail to put out even a tit in decades long tease, yet again. And to think, I almost left my cynicism at the door earlier this week... WTF was I thinking? Wanderlust without the Lust. In the words of Gust Avrocados, "Here's to you; you mother fuckers" I hope you lose all your money.

[cylnzz]

Jennifer Aniston had her naked boobs pulled from her new movie "Wanderlust," putting a last-minute kibosh on a frontal topless scene out of consideration for her boyfriend and "Wanderlust" co-star, Justin Theroux, an insider tells TheWrap. Also read: Jennifer Aniston and Charlie Day Get Raw in "Horrible Bosses" Red Band Trailer (Video) The former "Friends" star demanded that the topless scene from the Judd Apatow-produced film, which hits theaters Feb. 24, be replaced with a tamer version, an individual with knowledge of the movie told TheWrap.

http://www.thewrap.com/movies/article/jennifer-aniston-yanked-her-bare-breasts-wanderlust-justin-theroux-35475

And... It's official.

[pharoahegypt]

Just as we always suspected then. just total bull to get the idiotic saps to stump up to watch another boring rom-com for the chance to also see her boobies... when she never had any intention of doing so...!!!???

what is it with jenn that she has to either make these rom-coms with boyfriends; or make them her boyfriend during the filming..??? has she never heard of actually acting for a living.... that is her job, so im told..???!!!

[General Halsey]

She will get naked and we will see it only if someone hack into the movie archive and stole some of the cut-out scenes of if some of her BF make sex tapes and release them after broke-up

[derekgraddy]

oh well....looks like i'll just have to settle for those pics that Jessica Alba had.

[TKilbourne101]

From the Jennifer Aniston picture thread.

My philosophy about nudity is simple: If you don't want to do it, don't do it. But don't tease people with it for publicity. If you want to keep your clothes on, pose in a magazine in which women keep their clothes on; don't pose in PL@YB@Y with your clothes on, like Olivia Munn did, just because it will get more attention. If you don't want to do nude scenes in films, then don't do nude scenes in films. Don't try to slide by with a shot of yourself from the back, like in THE BREAK-UP, and don't have your nude scenes pulled at the last second like Aniston just did now. Otherwise, when your next job offers are straight-to-video comedies and then straight back to television sitcoms, you'll have no one to blame but yourself.

This would be the time a JA sex tape would "leak" out.

[pharoahegypt]

oh well....looks like i'll just have to settle for those pics that Jessica Alba had.

you lost me....???? :confused::confused:

[mrgr8shag]

Wanderlust flopped big time at the box office this week. I say it's because of the cockteasing. There is no doubt in my mind it would have made twice as much money atleast if they had left the topless shots of Ms Aniston in.

http://search.yahoo.com/r/_ylt=A0oG7lpFrEpPjF8AplRXNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTB2YzM2ZGR vBHNlYwNzYwRjb2xvA2FjMgR2dGlkA01TWTAwOV8xNjc-/SIG=13t3fib4s/EXP=1330322629/**http%3a//www.usmagazine.com/entertainment/news/jennifer-anistons-wanderlust-bombs-at-the-box-office-2012262

[cylnzz]

:lmao:

Well deserved.

[madjack]

For the sake of her boyfriend pah! boyfriends come and go this film will exist forever as another reminder of what a scandalous pricktease she is

[CreepyThinMan]

Sorry but this chick is the epitome of AVERAGE.

[rmftsill]

does anyone even care any more?

[pdsme]

Sorry but this chick is the epitome of AVERAGE.

Yup. Average and a pricktease. Jennifer can go away. Past her prime. We don't need you!

Who might be joining Jennifer as a pricktease who can go away? One of my former favorites ... Mila Kunis. She'll never show anything but she'll want us to think she will. Toodles Mila.

[Frakas]

I don't know, Jennifer Aniston was pretty damn hot in Horrible Bosses.

[cylnzz]

I don't know, Jennifer Aniston was pretty damn hot in Horrible Bosses.

yep, we know she's hot, and 15 years ago if she'd said "Guys, Im not ever going nude on screen" we'd have said ok. I think it's the "Im naked this time, honest" >>>> yoink! "Hahaha, you just wasted another $10 for a total crap movie with a cut nude screen!" that really pisses folks off.

[pharoahegypt]

the weird thing is that she never even mentioned the semi nude scenes in HB.... they just appeared..... where as you rightly say; she's built the fervour up over this one; using the reaction to HB's nudity to boost interest in this one; then had the scene cut out...!!! that's why we're all up in arms over it...!!! not to mention the release date was originally last october, and was then put back until now..!!!! (for what reason..?? who knows..??)

[cylnzz]

Dont forget, there was promised nudity from her on "good girl", the "breakup"(supposed full monty, reshot at last minute), see thrus in "rockstar" + a les scene(cut to a pathetic peck of a kiss), an ass shot that was cut from "along came polly"(stiller did, but aniston had it re-shot), the supposed sex scene from "derailed" that was nothing, noticing a trend here? i been sort of following her career since friends, and its been the same thing on almost every one. sex scenes trimmed, nudity reshot etc for years now. take a look at the user chats on imdb of her films going way back. Always the same. No idea why Im stupid enough to care anymore. Habit I suppose. Rather like fucking your ex-wife one more time. It wont be that good, but you want to anyway.

[DTravel]

Strange, late night thought here. How much longer before we don't want to see her naked?

[pharoahegypt]

when it's obvious that her tits have started to go south.. perhaps.....??

[DTravel]

when it's obvious that her tits have started to go south.. perhaps.....??

And how will we know that if we never get to see them? :p

[cylnzz]

when it's obvious that her tits have started to go south.. perhaps.....??

Too late for that. She's 43 years old. Her tits went south 5 years ago minimum. She never had kids so that helped her out a good bit, but 40 year old tits are not the same as 20. Not even with help. They dont look the same and they sure as hell dont feel the same.

[flypaper]

Wasn't there a pic of her tits when she stared in 'Breakup'? I know I have a copy of it on my HD. I never heard anyone say it was a fake.

I agree that she is perhaps just average as Hollywood goes in both looks and acting ability. What she does is to put her face out there every chance she can, and stays in the public's eye, I think this is why her following is so loyal.

[cylnzz]

Wasn't there a pic of her tits when she stared in 'Breakup'? I know I have a copy of it on my HD. I never heard anyone say it was a fake.

I agree that she is perhaps just average as Hollywood goes in both looks and acting ability. What she does is to put her face out there every chance she can, and stays in the public's eye, I think this is why her following is so loyal.

It's totally real, and was stolen from the production room and sold to a French magazine by a staff member of the movie, who was fired and prosecuted by the studio along with the magazine. Aniston, I believe, also sued the studio which was settled in a flash.

It has, probably for longer than I've been alive, the dream of celeb collectors everywhere to get into a studio production archive. It was always claimed by the studios that things were scrapped or destroyed that ended up on the cutting room floor, and if you believe that I have this bit of land to sell you. For one minute, just imagine what Howard hughes celeb collection was like. He was starlet obsessed, famously, do you really think he pitched all those Jane Russell and company clips and pics? Sony executives in the 80s were notorius for requiring nude screen tests for any actress trying out for a part that contained nudity. Think of all the actresses who auditioned for "officer and a gentleman"... or the "big easy"... or "9-1/2 weeks"...


Hell, the retakes for 9-1/2 weeks might kill me. They're out there, and you know the rules, all it takes is a lot of $$$ to see them.

If you were a billionaire, would it bother you to spend 50 million for lifetime access to Hollywood's studio archives?

Hell, from a 25 year collectors stand point, it's almost a REASON to make the 50 million in the first place.

As a side note, it took 3, 12 hour days of shooting for Salma Hayek's nude swimming scene in "ask the dust". That's hours and hours of Salma running around buck-ass nekkid in high definition.

Or...

2 days filming for Halle Berry's sex scene in "monsters ball", look at the tiny outtake clip from that...

What's more, no cgi shadows, no crap angles, no cut aways. Just hours and hours of any angle you want Halle pseudo-fucking.

Studio probably had to bring in extra toilets, and handlotion by the case.

Just something to think of.

BTW, Aniston has been complaining lately that the crew intentionally made shooting her nude scenes stretch out...

LOL.

[pharoahegypt]

cant really argue with the above post. if rumours are true.

amazing how discreet certain lower level members of such crews seem to be too, probably for fear or being sued or found in a shallow grave... who also dont seem willing to divulge info on whether or not certain scenes exist of noted faces we'd all kill to see.

[cylnzz]

Has anyone noticed the total lack of Aniston since her latest switcheroo at the boxoffice?

Not one appearance or O&A since opening night.

[DTravel]

Has anyone noticed the total lack of Aniston since her latest switcheroo at he boxoffice?

Not one appearance or O&A since opening night.

Not uncommon for celebs to temporarily go "MIA" as they take some time for themselves and new events happen and new movies premiere. It hasn't been that long, so I personally don't think its a big deal.

[cylnzz]

This may be the longest no Aniston period Ive seen since the debacle of the re-shot nude scene in breakup. If i remember it right she hid out a couple months then came back with the hawaii bikini pics

[pharoahegypt]

I'd love to be able to say I really don't give a shit if she stays away.. But know that in reality; as soon as she flashes the flesh somewhere, no matter how little; i'll still be seeking the images wherever i can can find them...!!! Sad, but true. :o/

[cylnzz]

I'd love to be able to say I really don't give a shit if she stays away.. But know that in reality; as soon as she flashes the flesh somewhere, no matter how little; i'll still be seeking the images wherever i can can find them...!!! Sad, but true. :o/


it's a sickness, I say. I'm right there with ya. I hate her movies on average, and dont find her in even the same league as say, Bellucci, Hayek or Marceau, but I still wanna see a nice set of nudes.

Still not paying to see her movies tho.

[pharoahegypt]

Allegedly, the studio tried begging Jennifer to let them re-edit the topless scenes back in for the DVd release; the theatre release having bombed so badly; but she still has refused.:mad:

Other rumours coming via various sources, now claim that because of this her career in big budget movies is OVER...!! Big money was lost on this fiasco; and studios don't like to lose money, least of all in the current climate. :mad:

It's taken 4yrs to get a Bond movie out there, and they always make money; so the chances of them funding another Rom-Com loser for Miss Aniston's pleasure is looking somewhere between two hopes........ and Bob's dead..!!!;)

[pharoahegypt]

WANDER-LUST - NO-BUST..!!!

Here you go, confirmation of how the now infamous scene ended up....
http://ist1-4.filesor.com/pimpandhost.com/1/_/_/_/1/1/4/i/e/14ieN/JeNnifer_Aniston_Wanderlust_1080p-02_0.jpg (http://pimpandhost.com/image/15799757-original.html) http://ist1-2.filesor.com/pimpandhost.com/1/_/_/_/1/1/4/i/f/14ife/JeNnifer_Aniston_Wanderlust_1080p-05_0.jpg (http://pimpandhost.com/image/15799784-original.html) http://ist1-1.filesor.com/pimpandhost.com/1/_/_/_/1/1/4/i/f/14ifF/JeNnifer_Aniston_Wanderlust_1080p-09_0.jpg (http://pimpandhost.com/image/15799811-original.html) http://ist1-2.filesor.com/pimpandhost.com/1/_/_/_/1/1/4/i/g/14ig7/JeNnifer_Aniston_Wanderlust_1080p-11_0.jpg (http://pimpandhost.com/image/15799839-original.html)

Thanks, and all credit to OP at a certain well known nude graphics site.

[imtrying]

Allegedly, the studio tried begging Jennifer to let them re-edit the topless scenes back in for the DVd release; the theatre release having bombed so badly; but she still has refused.:mad:

Other rumours coming via various sources, now claim that because of this her career in big budget movies is OVER...!! Big money was lost on this fiasco; and studios don't like to lose money, least of all in the current climate. :mad:

It's taken 4yrs to get a Bond movie out there, and they always make money; so the chances of them funding another Rom-Com loser for Miss Aniston's pleasure is looking somewhere between two hopes........ and Bob's dead..!!!;)

Why on earth is the studio begging her? She works for them, they pay her salary. What's she going to do, threaten them, tell them she'll never do another rom-com for them? Based on the poor critical and box office reception to the last few of them, that's a risk the studio should be more than willing to take. One more tank job like this and it will be back to television, with maybe a stop at P*****y on the way.

[pharoahegypt]

I agree........ but the world is a strange place today....!!! Back in the day she'd have had to have slept with most of the studio execs just to even get a walk on part..... it's changed a little...!!!?? though ms lohan seems to prefer trying the old way....lol.

[mlc297207]

I agree with everyone, however the major problem is the producers and director casting her and women like her in movies that require nudity, either they hold her to the contract or this will continue and so far she's 2 for 2 {Wanderlust and The Break up} but I agree this latest box office bomb could'nt have help.

[boz2boz4]

It's too bad Jen decided to blur her breasts. Otherwise, she might have saved a terrible movie. And she might have saved a career that is doomed by making meaningless movies.

I actually have a movie plot that will resurrect her career, plus satisfy all of us who are her fans.

She plays a 45ish mother/widow whose early 20s daughter is getting married. The movie starts with Jen in her early-40s on the night before her husband's birthday. She decides to give him an early birthday present, by seducing him as he lies in the their bed. She emerges from the bathroom in a sexy, fully length, near-sheer nightgown. After teasing him verbally for a few seconds, she removes the gown, and the camera pans up as she takes it off.

She shows everything, from her shapely legs, to shaved labia, to a puff of hair on her mound to her breasts, shoulders, and face. The camera focuses on her face, then on her husband, and we see he is slowly looking at her up and down. The camera switches to Jen, and we see her as her husband sees her, ogling every bit of her body as she walks toward the bed.

The rest of the scene is beautiful, mature sex, and Jen shows more of her body, including her ass and labia from behind as he plays with her and she is on top. After an appropriate time, she asks him, "Do you wan to cum on my face?" Of course, he says, yes, and and we get to see not the actual act, but the aftermath, with her face striped six times from chin to the top of her hair.

The point of the scene is to show how loving a couple they are and how active and beautiful they are to each other as they make love. The way they make love, the full range of beautiful and giving sex, is necessary to show the maturity of their love and their relationship, as well as the way they make love.

We then cut to the present, as Jen and her daughter plan for the marriage, talking about what will be done and who will do what. They raise the question who will walk the daughter down the aisle. The daughter exclaims that she misses her dad. Jen just looks sad, so sad she can't speak, with tears filling her eyes. It's clear that Jen's husband has died, not too long ago.

We then meet the groom. To everyone but Jen, the groom is handsome and young, just like the daughter. To Jen, however, the groom is the reincarnation of her husband. She knows the fiance is not her husband, but to her he looks exactly like him, although a bit younger. This is one of the themes of the movie: that she is traumatized by losing the love of her life and projects that onto her daughter's fiance.

To carry this off, and to make Jen comfortable with the sex scenes, her real-life boyfriend, Justin Theroux will be play both the daughter's fiance and Jen's husband. As Jen's husband, he'll look 45ish and with the maturity and confidence that comes with accomplishment. As the fiance, he'll look 22, still not fully mature, reserved, a bit innocent.

Cutting to the chase, what happens next? The daughter becomes seriously ill, the wedding goes on anyway, as the fiance is a very loyal guy. Unfortunately, the daughter dies a few months after the wedding.

Now we enter the main part of the movie, the major theme. I think you know what comes next. Jen falls in love with her deceased daughter's widower, although he is only 23 now and she is 46. The rest of the movies explores their compatibility. There will be none of the trite cliches that we see in other movies about May-September romances, no statements about different music tastes, movies seen by Jen when released and by the daughter's husband on Netflix, not knowing who Ronald Reagan is. The movie will focus on their being in different times in their lives, explained by 20 years of Jen's growing up with her deceased husband.

This point will be driven home sexually when Jen seduces him. He's just not as comfortable with the ranges of sexual gifts that she can give him and those that she wants him to give her. She scene will still be gentle and loving without any hint of exasperation by her or embarrassment for him, but it will be clear that while they are compatible and on the same path emotionally, intellectually, and sexually, he is 20 years behind her and will never catch up.

That is major theme that will require great script writing and acting without words, to show that the only thing that separates them is 20 years: had he been 20 years older, they would have been meant for each other.

And, oh, by the way, Jen will show us lots of her body when she and the daughter's husband have sex. He plays with her breasts, she kneels over him and rubs her breasts over his entire body, from is face to his cock. He'll massage her entire body, front and back. The difference will be she knows what to do. He doesn't know nearly as much, and she has to tell him.

There's my ten cents' worth. I hope one of you is a movie producer and can get this done. This idea for this script is my gift to all of you.

[boz2boz4]

The problem is that actresses like Jennifer Aniston have and make so much money that they have complete independence. Their financial futures aren't tied to the success of the movies, because they receive high guaranteed payments. The producers have no leverage over them. They don't need to work in the future to be secure financially. It's the exact opposite of the old studio days. Can you imagine how much nudity we would have had then from major stars? It would have been awesome.

Is there any hope that the version of Wanderlust screened overseas several months ago will surface, or that someone will leak the original, unblurred scenes?

I agree with everyone, however the major problem is the producers and director casting her and women like her in movies that require nudity, either they hold her to the contract or this will continue and so far she's 2 for 2 {Wanderlust and The Break up} but I agree this latest box office bomb could'nt have help.

[Sirch]

She was adorable back in the days of friends and the best actor in the series. Her dropping her towel scene while prancing around the apartment was an eye opener for the imagination. Even if we only saw her back and sort of side of one breast.

Regarding today. Really can't say I care to see any women bare all after their 30's. If you waited this long, the fantasy kinda dies. I wanted to see you in your prime. There's something slutty about doing so later in age. Perhaps to rejuvenate a career or sell more BO tickets than you normally do.

But I don't have a problem if she doesn't want to show it all. That's her choice and she has the money to stand her grounds. So good for her.

What amazes me is how this women can work consistently in film for over 20 years and really not have a successful run at it. She defies the old saying "your only as good as your last film".

[pharoahegypt]

no one here is moaning about her deciding not to show her body;;; or they wouldn't be if she didn't keep promising to do so just to put bums on seats in the first place.....!!!!

yes; if she doesn't want to show her naked body; fine.. no problem....!!!

but don't keep telling us you're going to; sell extra tickets; then say "sorry, changed my mind"........ that's just not cricket...!!!

[Sirch]

Can't say Ive really followed her career after friends. So she's been teasing/promising for real, then not living up to the hype?

no one here is moaning about her deciding not to show her body;;; or they wouldn't be if she didn't keep promising to do so just to put bums on seats in the first place.....!!!!

yes; if she doesn't want to show her naked body; fine.. no problem....!!!

but don't keep telling us you're going to; sell extra tickets; then say "sorry, changed my mind"........ that's just not cricket...!!!

[MrBombastic]

Regarding Jen's career, I believe that the "powers that be" have made sure Jennifer never gets close to the realm of a serious actress. She has the potential to play a serious part but never does. Her only big hits are in comedies, which are no threat to any serious actress. Her breakup with Brad Pitt sealed her fate as an actress. As long as Jolie is in the picture and Jennifer is still a young, beautiful actress, she will be blacklisted to comedy hits. It's a power struggle that Jolie & Pitt are winning as the biggest stars in Hollywood, with a grudge against Jennifer.

[boz2boz4]

That "slutty" comment got me thinking. Jen clearly has taken all her clothes off and shown all her charms to the crew on several movie sets, including The Break Up and Marley and Me, and shown her breasts to a large number of the crew in Wunderlust. But she doesn't want the world to see her nude, out of respect to her boyfriend. Does that not sound like a prostitute who keeps her job secret and exposes herself only to a few, instead of a men's club dancer or an actress like Michelle Williams? There's something neurotic about the distinction she's drawing in finding it OK to expose herself to a few men but not to all.

She was adorable back in the days of friends and the best actor in the series. Her dropping her towel scene while prancing around the apartment was an eye opener for the imagination. Even if we only saw her back and sort of side of one breast.

Regarding today. Really can't say I care to see any women bare all after their 30's. If you waited this long, the fantasy kinda dies. I wanted to see you in your prime. There's something slutty about doing so later in age. Perhaps to rejuvenate a career or sell more BO tickets than you normally do.

But I don't have a problem if she doesn't want to show it all. That's her choice and she has the money to stand her grounds. So good for her.

What amazes me is how this women can work consistently in film for over 20 years and really not have a successful run at it. She defies the old saying "your only as good as your last film".

[Sirch]

That "slutty" comment got me thinking. Jen clearly has taken all her clothes off and shown all her charms to the crew on several movie sets

Actors can ask for a skeleton crew on set when doing nudity.

While that one topless shot did leak out, I wonder if she had pasties covering the goods in Wanderlust? Considering how many people were within her proximity. With the digital blocking how would we ever know?

On the other hand it could be like you said. She got her kicks doing a little bit of voyeurism in a controlled environment with the confidence it wouldn't ever go "public".

[pharoahegypt]

Actors can ask for a skeleton crew on set when doing nudity.

I'm aware that these 'skeleton' crews only mean that there are around forty dribbling crew hanging around, rather than the usual sixty..!!!

While that one topless shot did leak out, I wonder if she had pasties covering the goods in Wanderlust? Considering how many people were within her proximity. With the digital blocking how would we ever know?


It was supposedly filmed with Jen completely topless; and allegedly with the intention of showing her breasts; it was only later that they used cgi to block out her breasts.:confused:

Have to agree though; there are now most probably plenty of studio hands and crew out there who have seen her topless, and don't even care that they have; whereas as for all her faults... we bloody well do want to..!!!:mad:

[boz2boz4]

Now that is well said. Jen being nude does matter to us!

Have to agree though; there are now most probably plenty of studio hands and crew out there who have seen her topless, and don't even care that they have; whereas as for all her faults... we bloody well do want to..!!!:mad:

[cylnzz]

So, I saw "Wanderlust in the $5 bin at Walmart here this past week. Already. You might even consider that a milepost. Soon she'll be direct to video.

[boz2boz4]

Our best hope is that she has an expensive lifestyle, has spent most of what she has earned, has diminished royalties from "Friends" and her movies, and soon will so need to make a movie that she will consent to some extensive Michelle Williams- and Sarah Silverman-style nudity. Maybe she'll even have to do what Dana Plato did: pose for Playboy and make a porn movie.

So, I saw "Wanderlust in the $5 bin at Walmart here this past week. Already. You might even consider that a milepost. Soon she'll be direct to video.

[imtrying]

Here we go again. Jennifer Aniston is making a new film called "We're the Millers" in which the 43 year old actress plays a prostitute. A spokesperson promises "a lot of skin". Yeah, well I'll believe it when I see it.

[pharoahegypt]

and after all that shite about not getting her tits out on film for the respect of her boyfriend; he ups and leaves her to go back to his wife..!!!! well thank you very f**kin much justin... ruined the only good part of a shite film for everyone, and then now you've had ur end away; you're off...!!!!!

PEOPLE I DONT LIKE - PART ONE...... JUSTIN THEROUX...!!!!!

seriously again; jennifer seriously must be one hard girl to live or have a relationship with; as she goes through boyfriends/lovers more than i change my damn socks..!!!!! has the got semi-permanent genital warts or herpes or summat...?????

[Zathras]

and after all that shite about not getting her tits out on film for the respect of her boyfriend; he ups and leaves her to go back to his wife..!!!! well thank you very f**kin much justin... ruined the only good part of a shite film for everyone, and then now you've had ur end away; you're off...!!!!!

PEOPLE I DONT LIKE - PART ONE...... JUSTIN THEROUX...!!!!!

seriously again; jennifer seriously must be one hard girl to live or have a relationship with; as she goes through boyfriends/lovers more than i change my damn socks..!!!!! has the got semi-permanent genital warts or herpes or summat...?????

Dont know where you got your info but it's dead wrong. They got engaged about 10 days ago.

As for the topic at hand... Doubt we'll get any nudity from her.

[pharoahegypt]

Saw it on the front page of one of those 'womens mags' today......

So it MUST be true..!!! ;)

[zplonk]

Read in the newspaper today that she is to go topless in her next film.
It's called Wanderlust in which she plays a housewife who goes to live in a hippie community.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1306437/Jennifer-Aniston-topless-new-film.html

God, I hope not! She's like 50 or something, and Alice Krige ... she's not.

That would as embarrassing as seeing Sophia Loren in Pret a porter in a bodice.

Sorry, this thread seems to be really old.

[DTravel]

God, I hope not! She's like 50 or something, and Alice Krige ... she's not.


Whiskey Tango Foxtrot Interrogative :confused:

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000098/
Born:
February 11, 1969 in Sherman Oaks, California, USA

2012 - 1969 = 43; subtract another year because filming was most likely done a year prior = 42. 42 =/= 50.

[pharoahegypt]

Yes, DT..... it does seem that someone was clearly on the bottle while making a post..??

I also concur with the WTF intro most wholeheartedly..!! lol. Early forties is correct. She's 5 mths older than my good self, not that I would like to be seen naked on screen either.

[kennyjackson]

She will when she's about 90 and no one wants to see it (not even 90 yr old men). Aniston's prime pose-nuide-in-a-magazine years have passed her by.

[teabags]

personally speaking you fellas are nuts, Jennifer aniston is superhot still, her body is much better than women half her age, just cause she's in her 40s you say she isnt worthy of being hot naked or topless?..short sighted and narrow minded..you see her in bikinis and you see a hot body , would look better naked of course

[Historian]

I'm not a major fan, but I'd certainly agree that Jennifer would be well worth seeing nude- I just find the whole 'will she, won't she' saga from her is starting to get a bit tedious now...